DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 55UMeRPJ2985561 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 55UMeRPJ2985561 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=bDWGbqpJ X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1F5EC385772F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1751323225; bh=IlCuaIqMFSZxeTQXFzKkvCyapFI9QSZ5fuO2j5Zi0LI=; h=To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=bDWGbqpJb5OnVdx1+O6gTooN3M6Q2GYpVCDwg9vSZdXQb9H5n2AzMGoyrRVff13EJ zC7KiopCIOpOwfMEZI8WDk7yJyCUpZvzrezVsr/FIBbSDHTC9jz3QKY5MQIREh1DqT uyaZ6nNFfO3M8KI4XgqHIIFtKCVOCyGbR/2f7Yw0= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 3F6EE3858431 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 3F6EE3858431 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1751323160; cv=none; b=GvphX8EQoPFFy2B6zEqqxtJoGtytECdtAQVKrQPtDY7CX+OSofhDs3ojy0GE5tnhUsvTzKB8n58ErDFZGQQYaF/91qQ7bOlUxxNb+t6S4i64H+b1WMqUeFur6x306UC1aUZwaay7jCtca7T2hnHqNOGXQVQkAPqtt8StVCrebn8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1751323160; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hpHnjCjKc/ZI/8O/8S8sJ5ZQ2G3zAy7Ygf9Hn1d5s9Y=; h=To:Subject:From:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=wzC4ESZZ01l36gms3akiuSOYhW2Jf4Z+2SAuEdhCnrN9TebgbtQbwNXT4f1sX+0HB2pp7hxv16G/Gmg6K0kRel6J9DIrSQsv1avDTMDCqME1pId9fnUaIho3AWju6NmfS/T+2ySdxcR8JXrR0Y9/bU0Lz84TF4ifDXALcimJ9zU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3F6EE3858431 To: Dan Harkless Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Aidan Kehoe Subject: Re: XEmacs as a Cygwin64 package. References: <6861 DOT 633f DOT 55bc7 DOT 1add AT parhasard DOT net> <179e452a-b5ac-48fc-8c13-da48498c1bb0 AT harkless DOT org> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 23:39:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <179e452a-b5ac-48fc-8c13-da48498c1bb0@harkless.org> (Dan Harkless via Cygwin's message of "Sun\, 29 Jun 2025 15\:03\:12 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.101 (Gnus v5.10.10) XEmacs/21.5-b35 (linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Edinburgh-Scanned: at seine.is.ed.ac.uk X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: "Henry S. Thompson via Cygwin" Reply-To: "Henry S. Thompson" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id 55UMeRPJ2985561 Dan Harkless via Cygwin writes: > To be clear, "32-bit" was a modifier to "Cygwin", not to "XEmacs".  > There are no more 32-bit Cygwin maintainers, because it's been > discontinued, no?  That being said, I downloaded the Cygwin list > archives so I could find the last time I asked about this on the > list.  It was in 2021, after the xemacs package for 64-bit Cygwin had > been dropped, but before support for 32-bit Cygwin ended (the > following year).  Reportedly, XEmacs was having build problems on > 64-bit Cygwin.  When I asked for more info on that, here's the > response that was sent: > >     From: Henry S. Thompson >     Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:47:10 +0100 >     Subject: [HEADSUP] Phasing out old Windows versions and 32 bit support >      [XEmacs for 64-bit?] >     In-Reply-To: (Dan > Harkless >      via Cygwin's message of "Wed\, 27 Oct 2021 15\:36\:45 -0700") >     References: >      >     Message-ID: > >     Dan Harkless via Cygwin writes: >     > ... >     > Anyone know more about the difficulty in getting those packages to >     > work on 64-bit? > >     Um, yes, I did a lot of work on that back in 2015 and got it working >     under Cygwin, with a lot of help from Vin Shelton, but never to the >     point of public release because it _only_ compiled with gcc, not with >     native Windows C tool chain. > >     I still use it every day, it crashes about once a week.  Given the >     demise of 32-bit, I'll try to get back to it some time in the next few >     months, but there's other stuff in the queue ahead of that... That last paragraph is mostly true, except thta crashes are very rare. That is, I'm actively using XEmacs in a 64-bit up-to-date Cygwin, it compiles with gcc and runs out-of-the-box. I also regularly use many of the XEmacs packages with no obvious platform-related issues. How easy that means it will be to build a Cygwin package is another matter, as I have no experience with cygport. There is a closed issue [1] which suggests that compilation under Visual Studio for Win32 is working. ht [1] https://foss.heptapod.net/xemacs/xemacs/-/issues/5 -- Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh 10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND e-mail: ht AT inf DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk URL: https://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam] -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple