DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 55DLNe821677585 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 55DLNe821677585 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=AOne7omF X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 290D4392510A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1749849818; bh=5HHYvidVAKLci3iegsOYlgjBUSM0R7IpCb/8Nhtnd7U=; h=Date:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:From; b=AOne7omFG2lA427hY5e/yYVJz+xr/X6y4j/JXgeUPib317xLuU6hiuqPyfHWKE193 4xlQhLuSjUyIq1zZvR0WkBPs3W3h++1doxAkuRf5JTvM44u2z2sQ2RATsPJqa6xkCU fIUlxK3A4Bq3JFHfehq9fLuZel6QJtcOheTG4IgM= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org E2B4F38FB67B ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org E2B4F38FB67B ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1749849792; cv=none; b=ijBv0QQGcxguCzPLt7XO4trHjH3dHGwZaSQyf+WnfH9rl/z+p/ORvR9F6Gi6GHs5y3IB62LWZVEB1vMnQj7J+S11esLf7MBvPrRJvPqJibCc7LGKePhm+OK3sKj85JTXuIhUDdgtdaCyW7ZT6keG6rv3ohCSRGKMl6nJIi8+YJI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1749849792; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rT/N44Zaja0efsLAcEGcmWuVMcFNA4tCKoxDBMgPJkA=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=g0zF65daTYXsN0DjE+5TWuXKxFm66LC8Qpc1omnkGBGNLt3KeIizkDPzJ0REX9lR56Q8i0o/q08CRo+2JNfIXXjf3zNiHibXuwYbjbnJG0NdRg0GxKuAZ7g4TkR1TypzJ4UiNiwtq44LB6UiSLzKgKXPieOiXWZNxyGXzyYm6EA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E2B4F38FB67B Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:23:11 -0700 (PDT) X-X-Sender: jeremyd AT resin DOT csoft DOT net To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: posix_spawn difference from Linux Message-ID: <35d5a3b2-e060-cb17-7e2a-75f6b6e8d0a5@jdrake.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Jeremy Drake via Cygwin Reply-To: Jeremy Drake Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Cygwin" I am working on some posix_spawn tests for the new stc repository [1], and making sure they behave the same between Cygwin and Linux. I found one case (so far) which does not: passing NULL for argument "envp" to posix_spawn. In Cygwin, this results in the child inheriting the environment from the caller (same as passing "environ"), but on Linux this results in the child getting an empty environment (same as passing a char *envp[] = {NULL}). The Open Group doc on posix_spawn doesn't seem to say anything about the potential for envp being NULL, but does mention > For the Ada language binding for Start_Process to be implemented with > posix_spawn(), that binding would need to explicitly pass an empty > signal mask and the parent's environment to posix_spawn() whenever the > caller of Start_Process allowed these arguments to default, since > posix_spawn() does not provide such defaults. That at least implies that passing NULL does not default to using the parent's environment. Thoughts? Is this a bug in Cygwin, or "undefined behavior" that it's perfectly within its rights to do whatever it feels like in response (empty environment or inherited environment, or crash every second Tuesday)? -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple