DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 5569Io042585988 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 5569Io042585988 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Pw7AVtgp X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DC2963856942 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1749201528; bh=Kf4Quqv/eOjhVBwlKqoNrG+p4AZH6GBeR0q/z9An8/o=; h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=Pw7AVtgpOBAfYGyZ9lZKwQYXNAoETnf6vla6xzn1by9C8t1OFTPRHDQezIV8hMZN5 D4fFbhDliIqM9TuRU0BTsPV5GeTbEbvn9ZRoLlGg88eh2fZoKhz/Rb8cGuPU9gZh7Z UfAst2p14IalDRYh3o91Beu7iZQ24dqfAltVV+/Y= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 1C3BC3857B98 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 1C3BC3857B98 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1749199756; cv=none; b=Rs2708Sn3ymoBstL8ETcmix2ld3Jb7hkss9IVws0CVIszB/HEBVlRIXIUnPOnU1rBrAJvs0k73+kmNLTBLB8bDCBmpkry7vqykztjM4KMmFQ8/9+L5CZnV8OyJfWgge4COOpZzZ53ShIde3fbL1ekJqjLT9NwM12W014Hqpe7S0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1749199756; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uoTMDSGGr236jIen7itfSfHKeXxbyStpVpYMWgKK8UM=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=Sfnnab3Xnbx9IQNzT6Xt4R1l+plQbdayJZEkpbV8pM189ZOOReVWnH+zuNKMOl2eZILd1k9nDh7QfJnUDqviyf25C5e3B5xvnFj6S0myJkBGVFldyZMXGOz3yrXDl8rjf9/BBTPQU/sSkKNlw8dG8LmZPTs5pwH0vBe5Gr+WhrY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1C3BC3857B98 Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 04:49:12 -0400 To: Jeremy Drake Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: instruction cache flushing in Cygwin Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Glenn Strauss via Cygwin Reply-To: Glenn Strauss Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 11:33:18PM -0700, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin wrote: > I noticed while looking at JIT test failures in LLVM that they don't have > an implementation for Cygwin for flushing the instruction cache. I don't > see any Cygwin function calling FlushInstructionCache, is there some > POSIXy function for this? I don't really want to have to include Windows > headers just to get FlushInstructionCache and GetCurrentProcess, risking > pulling in a lot of extra definitions. Do you need something specific to Cygwin, or something that is specific to CPU-architecture? GCC and Clang both have __builtin___clear_cache() intrinsic (yes, with all those underscores) Cheers, Glenn -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple