DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 5557pCa51505104 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 5557pCa51505104 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=J4ZcFVKt X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 43FC2385772F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1749109870; bh=tzSlaCL9b/xKENJs+K6AcXOYRyb2AuV5Lfrp0GZyYqo=; h=References:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=J4ZcFVKtezrpccqOaTDule45GUvFRPBf/Jmpua0hbwh5ZqfDLakXenw+cpQ1VrPNF 5oO10Kjoc2SaBay0/qJGo0Q5zQBaWbCdvuHr/0kU3c9Yn3uDUAkKDrhyUaB6xYyLld SsaaM+DVLrnVZc+OrrDjka3Ez/4sqOnCUiCMOSbQ= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 65A9F3857359 ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 65A9F3857359 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1749109840; cv=none; b=qUhOZeV8uVdxv7w2VSWostKFMB+JmJY0bM3qhqF5wfyr/59M+6lWXOssdW+Av6sPLHiu0g4KFCJCs/qjOWHiBrWiYOmJjSKNQ/nsx75pTo2HoXG+142VFz+H0AUJ1oTcqF3OVNq8NQYiY2RnEDX1eO2qmLerOo2eNcrucORe++0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1749109840; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ghZgfb4MwQ7k0Q6+VDjquKTNNrjsYUteJ7wXBghKGE0=; h=DKIM-Signature:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To; b=cNJbE7JxfpeMxrs3jmTGhUwkWB3r7urBTWEc0ahTUL57mmhIdE4XuzF3QP/6/1uS6rZbJM2yq2J9mN4WTokts6e+4Mp+7Sys5opB/aqYPznsX/2D0d9289K3iD2PqwCmeMHMKeiOTMKdkHzxYB6ixr0WJcZqYF3wMhy7tWy3sFU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 65A9F3857359 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1749109839; x=1749714639; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Cz4Hv/UDoAzRUj+RS8g1gzTvTpMwfBbpBFfpZnOiEvA=; b=gsqJPuPSf2JOENHHqySLWLtjqwzM3a5IvtKwp7pK46LC+qynVm8hIatYMN8+IELtGL l1cdJO8UdVF4E2QysHNMdbrDUvPYYXEstcL6WfG3d0jcvSCJ4LL8A6cTCbGL4Op8m68d 0cAczZOhZdWWbHtaMR638qZiYl8rRBjOgV0xQziYnamLv9gjShL29fHzYTiR5SK8/HmS UvyHeiCdUitLrQLnm4UEHU37uwTx5Y0eYI6HROH9WxbChwavNig8DYz4S+FegHUCs4+O 1HiqNKWeGUVd+fDV2ONrzKIJ2+cPG0urdMD+tGQoStqnjmryAIGEsoy9fmNqvbNe4JNJ 4AcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxLtjA+0NGYGWRe3Q8jDXJjz84nzBjT/p0daIjxfVx/Of6CZEdL uvM1MKGk5fGNYXWTT18towLEO8iH3sAodx/07/Kn8wNcENEYKGnTqyez3pCNyk/hiVRP+IfFlv5 LyfU0kvwFSzGM4WXnLEJZxeOP8KRB9RGsmA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctQhiFkPmAM8pYjVmO+SRMBMs1x59StAEn+WfQib29IZuFtlc7K6qc4n+Odhpv +Cu56rAyDn6XlZd2CMLRXhkHDKwL2Kllps/2o+ca1sSsTOF0U/afpj9D0zeTTf/M7Q0YHbv99jO NRyo8SuN8nk0Xl3L5ibytSkiEOjASPHFBM X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEW23EDy4S7UA2Bps6yOAeZsoEefsiY4wuHBW4pgYcsnrhIil7IHuj7Trn1JcAwwA2CcBWZehbevUuHrIYc+y4= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:164b:b0:311:ea13:2e70 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3130cd16111mr9763076a91.14.1749109838748; Thu, 05 Jun 2025 00:50:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <69c1b2e6-bea8-49fc-a5c5-406f53ee7a47 AT SystematicSW DOT ab DOT ca> In-Reply-To: <69c1b2e6-bea8-49fc-a5c5-406f53ee7a47@SystematicSW.ab.ca> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 09:49:00 +0200 X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFtTiwDuOWEloSdQfqod-QZE8XFY-xLhV65j2o1HOO0Et5HV6Erf9R4opr4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why no "World" group in Cygwin? To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Cedric Blancher via Cygwin Reply-To: Cedric Blancher Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Cygwin" On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 at 20:46, Brian Inglis via Cygwin wrote: > > On 2025-06-04 10:58, Cedric Blancher via Cygwin wrote: > > Why is there no "world" group in Cygwin by default? > > So war I've found EVERY Windows access token contains an group entry > > for S-1-1-0 (World), which makes me wonder by Cygwin doesn't generate > > a GID by default. > > It's also called Everyone on some Windows versions/editions, and does not fit > the POSIX security model, but is used in D/ACLs for Other 007. How would a POSIX group (i.e. getent group world) not fit into the POSIX model? Just everyone would be member of this group... Ced -- Cedric Blancher [https://plus.google.com/u/0/+CedricBlancher/] Institute Pasteur -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple