DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 52AK29a52928068 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 52AK29a52928068 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=lmyRyi/I X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 635863858C5F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1741636928; bh=2+GSCjlj0dzqOk458D1toLVkeIbDlsxARiMmhIk99G8=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=lmyRyi/ITgf/80sXljgq+McI5nUGJS70E6pRqpcUQZayUx8CREKJLuYPEgCkbbhOg p2GXBqKBK7ye8thwt5zFnoS0fp2W/rr41q1V9AQj2cF/4BOfliCpaYRpG9Hi4ReyQL yu41Zg7q3wSrgZhSVDuraL0ma4C7kr1sVQ12ZxvU= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 205923858D20 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 21:01:29 +0100 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Tool for listing sparse file layout Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Corinna Vinschen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Mar 7 15:43, Cedric Blancher via Cygwin wrote: > On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 at 13:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Stop telling us what we're supposed to do for you. It's pretty > > annoying how you're exerting group pressure with (per last counting) > > five accounts to let us do your bidding on the Cygwin mailing list. > > Apologies. This was not intended. It's actually hard to see how this was not intended if one of your guys starts a thread and you and (for instance) Roland chime in in a really pushy way. > Just the bigger picture: > [...] We all have a day job as well! > cygutils-extra There is no cygutils-extra package either. > > If you want that package in the > > distro, do it yourself and become Cygwin package maintainer: > > > > https://cygwin.com/packages.html > > Is it wise to put a simple utility in a separate package? Yes. Even simple utilities should have a (willing) maintainer. You can ask the maintainer of the cygutils package if he's willing to maintain this additional tool, but it's just as well you keep it under your own (or Roland's, being the developer) control. The usual packaging process applies: https://cygwin.com/packaging-contributors-guide.html Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple