DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 51QDb5vj163599 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 51QDb5vj163599 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=ZC5yz9Qc X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 65BB53858D26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1740577023; bh=eSWrVxtDbIYD8dY5kBAnhcnbU2kbVi7WtoKk5JtUmEI=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=ZC5yz9QcIRIcgIT1eG+4etdtozJisZhQqJmYgQciOwM8EyyPKWDkz1tNSsyXBHHHG 7wBelD1fARr7tg+svIOnayKBk2qVr1QWKg6kYqK3FJKRaYWF0XE7E0kVPNdL80Xkge B2uld+Bl+3+D7BwPxuog8SHT6mzF0R/P1PL6PzD4= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 93D4C3858D26 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:36:39 +0100 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Registering new |WNNC_NET_*| keys ? / Re: Document support for @ character in UNC paths Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Corinna Vinschen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 51QDb5vj163599 On Feb 26 11:15, Roland Mainz via Cygwin wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 2:22 AM Jeremy Drake via Cygwin > wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Feb 2025, Takeshi Nishimura via Cygwin wrote: > > > No, it's beegfs.sys you install. > > > SMB is not used, it uses its own protocol. If you do a > > > FileRemoteProtocolInfo query the protocol field says it's a > > > WNNC_NET_RDR2SAMPLE. > > > > Always nice when a driver doesn't change "sample" idenfiers. It seems > > Virtualbox shared folders also squats on this identifier. I imagine > > things don't go well if one attempts to install beegfs.sys on a virtualbox > > virtual machine with their guest drivers installed... > > I think the problem is that no one in the OpenSource world really > knows how to register new |WNNC_NET_*| keys. QEmu shared folders, > DOKANY, ms-nfs41-client, etc. all use |WNNC_NET_RDR2SAMPLE| because > the sample filesystem code uses that. So if ms-nfs41-client uses WNNC_NET_RDR2SAMPLE, we don't have to handle these shares when checking the WNNC_NET_MS_NFS provider. While it would be nice if the nfs v4 driver would use some other WNNC type, this is at least helpful for handling WNNC_NET_MS_NFS shares, because they have more than one quirk... Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple