DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 51JFpsGT4008024 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 51JFpsGT4008024 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=PLtQZQLx X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 54EDD3858280 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1739980312; bh=xFuT1KTGyPjSX0Od9Mi1URpFuke19rjTugsCNqrjS+Y=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=PLtQZQLxG9Pfnp7DhkfmB/Lha0S43T9lq+WA/Tjb9eVLRefDbJO4+FxLhFYz3wkyH M3rpP4aQGDCcBa8UkRX0fJh1S8VSMDfQ33uj3wkXOsh+6vsEOjCQdH7VP7ww+KB5DD UVb6qlRtRq4p/41jFLM+LQjrgDg4gH23jLUVz8lY= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 16:37:34 +0100 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin 3.6.0 vs. libbsd 0.11.7-3: -lbsd breaks setproctitle() Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4250e737-217a-2b55-c6df-8567b283da15 AT t-online DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Corinna Vinschen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Feb 19 14:40, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > On Feb 19 14:25, Christian Franke via Cygwin wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > > > So I think we rather shouldn't supply the libbsd version of > > > setproctitle_init/setproctitle anymore, as soon as cygwin 3.6.0 is > > > released. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > Makes sense. But then existing programs already using the functions from > > cygbsd-0.dll would no longer start. Perhaps keep the symbols in the DLL only > > for some time? > > Sure! The new version will just disable the header definitions but > still export the symbols for backward compat. I just realized that this isn't sufficient. The link lib libbsd.dll.a must not export the symbol either. Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple