DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 51CBBWnu735611 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 51CBBWnu735611 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=T1CpBAvF X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 64CCB385840B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1739358690; bh=JndlOHmWg3Jhm6g5YauvKo0Hf0IRIDtjVStTwdSCr5Q=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=T1CpBAvFXxtQg9uYjvjJUBj5onM3xduG4qChePKkA6BEfYjVuLUAsu7QL7ZhOSWVJ SvILRJJ5GY49+t2S3NqpJ5vOZb2zKeWs96TmZRJ48OlS2oyNDTKFXptFWBKlfIPW5O JfqkOEgteXrJGSvzxV7X9E/NUeUMOab8+TMW4Tok= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 269F63858C53 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 12:11:05 +0100 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: __builtin_thread_pointer Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <9c6a1ccc-d2fb-4aaf-b8c2-29574fa640b4 AT cornell DOT edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Corinna Vinschen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Feb 11 16:45, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: > On 2/11/2025 4:03 PM, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: > > Ken, check the source or configury of your package. It looks weird that > > this function should be called architecture-independently. > Thanks for the suggestion. It's actually not called > architecture-independently, but the code was convoluted and I didn't see at > first what was going on. It turns out that I just had to add > "#if !defined(__CYGWIN__)" at the right place and the build succeeded. Great! Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple