DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 delorie.com 50E0LojJ3049047
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com
Authentication-Results: delorie.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 50E0LojJ3049047
Authentication-Results: delorie.com;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=AQjFjjQg
X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7C0C4385771B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com;
	s=default; t=1736814109;
	bh=Xqka0nhHfTZHmVV7QMyImgzdwN77yblooAE67chm/fA=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:
	 List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:
	 From;
	b=AQjFjjQg/pqWV21ePEdDbEu4FdwVlDNabAf7Bhejb56Af0EKy+g5D5ZSV+AXsyQDj
	 erzd0IKGbbVUdc0y9ZvKrGTf+DiQkY8MRZ3uAu10wCYI5KWhcB7mS5T1O5cRX4nnrO
	 4aLLqT4mZcLwwqbA+sM3E9xYi7DGUdU60IR7mkt4=
X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 3667D3858D38
ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 3667D3858D38
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1736813846; cv=none;
 b=VJ73EXp/nPl+MfgrTa60fefqUsw2cbAWt3pBoHy+uGCmcoBtvi300B/Ju6P1qZYb75PKdwGSBnE7DfwsS47zjeIyTXxzxR+Csx1iOzwOn/PTcbptL08s9K7rb+z+E39IU7ASH6nWZAVWqGJhfiaNI8bqFGW1RkTQnrA8MVZbOnw=
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key;
 t=1736813846; c=relaxed/simple;
 bh=uA0obY2b4O1jFLvwg9sGwEJig4mn/ibes150T/XYGwE=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version:DKIM-Signature;
 b=YdAHNh+9Wulj5d9jWa4FXWURc/vxIRMdV6rmOT0M6SemLf9HZ0zVX+mj4JIQH+HTIA2YE0ZyUEgZL7bAAz1njTKcesMfZfxEkIfsCv0B5gVyDeY+mwARN7gwohTAfXBSc7Itte0CNCx65jL7gakA5K3cbxB+XVZ5BZpKKx3hBvY=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3667D3858D38
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 09:17:23 +0900
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Hangs in cygwin 3.5.5-1: should 3.5.5-1 be rolled back?
Message-Id: <20250114091723.37adbe4e332d2af1336a943d@nifty.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <671e9695-5b53-c237-5265-5f95d3d7700e@jdrake.com>
References: <e64d01c0-ecad-4427-a0b4-1b30b4b45ed9 AT yahoo DOT de>
 <7d3aa20f-45b8-44a8-a353-a374d082c0b5 AT yahoo DOT de>
 <20250114085736 DOT 907bf487dfb51d0c5e11c402 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
 <671e9695-5b53-c237-5265-5f95d3d7700e AT jdrake DOT com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/options/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://cygwin.com/mailman/listinfo/cygwin>,
 <mailto:cygwin-request AT cygwin DOT com?subject=subscribe>
From: Takashi Yano via Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com
Sender: "Cygwin" <cygwin-bounces~archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>

On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 16:10:17 -0800 (PST)
Jeremy Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin wrote:
> 
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > Personally, I personally prefer releasing 3.5.6 ASAP. However, we
> > are not sure that we have already fixed all the major problems in
> > 3.5.5.
> >
> > Can you please test latest cygwin 3.6.0 (TEST) whether the your
> > CI issue still happens?
> >
> > If the CI problem still happen even with 3.6.0 (TEST), we should
> > consider rolling back to 3.5.4. Otherwise, releasing 3.5.6 is
> > the proper way to go, I think.
> 
> Unless I'm mistaken,
> https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2024q4/013145.html has not yet
> been pushed to any branch (main or cygwin-3_5-branch), so I'd expect the
> issues to still happen.

Oops!
Corinna, how about pushing this patch only to the main branch for now?

-- 
Takashi Yano <takashi DOT yano AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp>

-- 
Problem reports:      https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                  https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:        https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:     https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple