DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 delorie.com 44TAR4ZX1612589 Authentication-Results: delorie.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=cygwin.com header.i=@cygwin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=R/j9td0T X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 101C4385ED69 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1716978424; bh=UlvXbSkEHMbdmg7X/c1EREE8kxxBzdpi0cPvWnNXDtM=; h=To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=R/j9td0TLGPERymyEepOEMFED5hJmkz4pBNR1+UwHWus8XjDB3yPQ+DwP1zW/DsnD bC+0pNKtdcG/jE8iXp4Q/NMQhP2jPXwxWJ/zZZITEqH3/Rmsam6uf2xqVXpDwU/Cu+ xO2C3flrH/FDqMe52IUB0g4nLGFkndFa43uAV2wM= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 08BCD385840F ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 08BCD385840F ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1716978402; cv=pass; b=hkfQVDsDZASOMMqS/SHe5KcgRcAIf1/lPCgbOhk/xLlCE5vwJZCHTszAtWCgyfKFblPMx9pAsqzNbOVdSP3C+U3O9f5DrgnEGN601NMZZ4GvQ6T1kpRpDIYTHWaeiFPRCL0KgZq8a61+8poHaftqgTNqYgTKnEa4Qw0xk8YmWo8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1716978402; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JVNTbmLPw8Z1yQbhzNIvWJskCC2Vvd28bEb4q3a3ExI=; h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version; b=XNXRvCgWYoouWL/4fZw0HvePCtKmb6KE/Z8YA7+mFE+X2UHfOtl7FQ+fHadGqnK/Ej1huWbm4ZjOO1SwLo9xVjXbwq90GqJD1zqIJYWp7w/f8y7cJ5cfhOhnbpqM7Q2on4M/PG02fkCIaOvGQOMmZKG3dm80rj6CsuMuqldFH68= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; server2.sourceware.org ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1716978392; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=d67dHIvq2TFGxSHxFylIXXkf0kVDHrk2c0YxHNxBRlSwS3y8FChLsd8f0hNaEfg5N+ 8LQndIQeegwPJXfHVwLOyqOOol+M8uoUGYZLQvQGn+VKKcI1lzzaDDWseYuWfZiSb16h oZ6vBq4T1huhJYABr6qTNXkYFbs1YClMLqjvLipDRKw6jncB8hHuGq0f5rbKxjoiW3zz WixVJgunxSx3wtn8XA/irYtzP7/QxSoJToN5l4dGIwN5Sej6jBYnLIFY1ECAUPscNPFF kB4X+jyWWr3MQvdk6j4vDtqHO9RUVn6lagChgrJ41Luel5OLsLK2k5lyswO3OMgFywvh ssgQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1716978392; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From:Cc:Date:From: Subject:Sender; bh=8maGF8ZqjjeGwEGpNVeHNsH/J8IZB7gjUIQgPdFuGYw=; b=kHUl5z6h0R94nRjzp1jZjKiaeOHMkiqgnzNS4kyjnRBvHGVF1tjm+N3jsGR/Eqlppe zfBk8iwULhI3GVu9SsBB9Hxkk+zxsfybyHRxNooAYsFKtL1h1jW013+EGYQrvMosRbf9 F7BGcRiwC3aV3pmrqqxvW7/L3fFEjKVQgLgm4xHuhVeItAcCf6trRbMiceE3RxfVMjeZ djZWLjj5A7Jt4bdA/H0TPdhMZVavTBIrHRj9cdez+cQwW0wKgXeMibQmRUJcF9ATsaqN xiYK51w5YbLxe58QqHjKytAoNE1vzhrE7qBBrWZig1vhtBhj1w68jYtm/T2D6qi3J8UD 74Og== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com; arc=none; dkim=none X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH0WWb0LN8XZoH94zq68+3cfpPAiqFt2JhGvFnRN6BsfqrAeOb8" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Takashi Yano Subject: Re: multithreading broken in Cygwin 3.5.3 Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 12:26:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4580924.dSzdyWo4uF@nimes> In-Reply-To: <20240529190619.53c5820ecafcf31909c4320c@nifty.ne.jp> References: <3631253 DOT RrQHTzY0li AT nimes> <20240529190619 DOT 53c5820ecafcf31909c4320c AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Bruno Haible via Cygwin Reply-To: Bruno Haible Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Takashi Yano wrote: > As you mentioned in private mail to me, this seems to be a regression of > pthread::once() introduced by > commit 2c5433e5da8216aaf7458e50c63683c68fb0d3e8. > > I'll submit a patch for that issue shortly. My workaround implementation of pthread_once (in gnulib) looks like this: /* This would be the code, for typedef struct { pthread_mutex_t mutex; _Atomic unsigned int num_threads; _Atomic unsigned int done; } pthread_once_t; */ if (once_control->done == 0) { once_control->num_threads += 1; pthread_mutex_lock (&once_control->mutex); if (once_control->done == 0) { (*initfunction) (); once_control->done = 1; } pthread_mutex_unlock (&once_control->mutex); if ((once_control->num_threads -= 1) == 0) pthread_mutex_destroy (&once_control->mutex); } It makes sure that - The last thread that had been dealing with the mutex deletes the mutex. - Once the mutex is deleted, is it never again accessed. The entry test of the 'done' boolean ensures this. Bruno -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple