X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B3EAB3858CDA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1690570766; bh=SwUzVkYaWbZGqU5Vm6aVxykEAs8ZHV6rnT9daUFKRa0=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=wWKCY61WcNZJWFVyAmOSMU4ylqoaXJou8SBTE7qNaCvmyE/rHws82Hs6IE8rcIp8e kX4I47pb2lPplJV6435wSbNg7+9lXU1wEt2MVVT7r8CreTpJWfiKwCnZotax2OlCZW tcc911aMeUCac2v6rjGlOkoBcG2Vnk0HrbdO5kAw= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7224D3858CDA Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 20:59:11 +0200 To: Bruno Haible Subject: Re: fnmatch improvements Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Bruno Haible , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <3884636 DOT 3uDm00564X AT nimes> <12689051 DOT 0j3nEXixpK AT nimes> <24556977 DOT snJFCo28Jb AT nimes> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <24556977.snJFCo28Jb@nimes> X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: Corinna Vinschen , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Jul 28 12:56, Bruno Haible via Cygwin wrote: > It's sometimes hard to make incremental changes to generated files of the > GNU Build System plus Gnulib. I've therefore recreated a new tarball for you, > at https://haible.de/bruno/gnu/testdir-fnmatch.tar.gz . > > The expected result is: > 1. cd testdir-fnmatch-posix > ./configure > grep REPLACE_FNMATCH config.status > (Expected: REPLACE_FNMATCH is 0) $ grep REPLACE_FNMATCH config.status S["REPLACE_FNMATCH"]="0" > make > make check > (Expected: No test failures) # TOTAL: 218 # PASS: 178 # SKIP: 40 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 0 # XPASS: 0 # ERROR: 0 test-fnmatch-5.sh is SKIPped because we don't support zh_CN.GB18030. > cd .. > 2. cd testdir-fnmatch-gnu > ./configure > grep REPLACE_FNMATCH config.status > (Expected: REPLACE_FNMATCH is 1, because of FNM_EXTMATCH) $ grep REPLACE_FNMATCH config.status S["REPLACE_FNMATCH"]="1" > make > make check > (Expected: No test failures) # TOTAL: 218 # PASS: 178 # SKIP: 40 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 0 # XPASS: 0 # ERROR: 0 Same SKIP of test-fnmatch-5.sh. Does that look ok? Thanks, Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple