X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F265938560A7 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1689728716; bh=UUqCCnvXV3ybjlcoPd/8iueXpOHOtZEkKNUwf/9DC7g=; h=Date:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=vdrMQDCDWOfMB67ronCeiR1JJ5ap/ClxiT3aGEv6wecrm1gsIo67ZsFUqFe3275vq McSRdYYHgZY7UXRSMqhiSquipaZ7qrDgbb+4woavAOvUluKaSODo1YJWEesmWNfHG5 5IOFruXqaSJ5JU5+ajdyHKhnJ4X0Eq7MUMubGQ04= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 52E723858C74 Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 18:02:34 -0700 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Update of ctags? Message-ID: <20230719010234.GO6600@phoenix> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4f4e9fa5-b45f-1c61-9e6f-5081a98950c0 DOT ref AT verizon DOT net> <4f4e9fa5-b45f-1c61-9e6f-5081a98950c0 AT verizon DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4f4e9fa5-b45f-1c61-9e6f-5081a98950c0@verizon.net> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.32-74-generic GNU/Linux User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Gary Johnson via Cygwin Reply-To: Gary Johnson Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On 2023-07-18, Larry via Cygwin wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering if the ctags maintainer would consider doing a package > update? Even though the version change is relatively small between the > one available and the latest one (5.8 -> 6.0), almost 100 new language > types have been added. > > Thanks for your consideration. I'm not the maintainer, but this would not be a package update; it would be a new package. The Cygwin ctags package is Exuberant Ctags 5.8, while ctags 6.0 is the latest release of Universal Ctags. Regards, Gary -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple