X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D1E513858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nifty.ne.jp Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nifty.ne.jp DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-02.nifty.com 228Nq5uF008898 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.ne.jp; s=dec2015msa; t=1646783526; bh=WALaq0wiv2AI7qfFGE6UdYxjdR6CtBMJioXDK64z4+o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=K4eLEunqwto/tO3jdHeyrZ3MQIWWQk+8D+qsS06WfeAIq+imrgoSjZazxLU1VzLYo aoYlYLWuW9NIpkhsLmOoNII6w9k30zIp+kRVUw+T/J2dKdMUQHZK/M53R7Qwo11TbO hL6sUu5Ny92mfrFp/kAw3QexB6lZhPwyg219KOarAvCk4rskUCKO+4WnDIgQqIszZT aIdWyigGRRfjaIRswcQtGFUELTFZ8sDInkE1Sr2VJDklbYlpMo+Jgn1R15cm6IAvH8 yhRnFbjo+kxSf/m5LLRV55qMet7hDCYfyt5o/cuiSNnCQ2X2IsRTmlYjT/xEX/o+98 PiQyuJAt+hLrg== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [119.150.36.16] Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 08:52:13 +0900 From: Takashi Yano To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Too many level of symbolic links (still have problem with sbmfs network drives) Message-Id: <20220309085213.6e6a2cf2bf842eb51e9dd0d5@nifty.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <03fc13d6-55c0-3fd3-87c0-857d026a1d1a@polymtl.ca> References: <21ce8733-b5b9-4f04-516a-c674b3cf1162 AT polymtl DOT ca> <20220305112326 DOT 8d07e89f03eb382f58023055 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <20220308001455 DOT 9da9b8e10b76e9350c22520a AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <03fc13d6-55c0-3fd3-87c0-857d026a1d1a AT polymtl DOT ca> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Philippe Debanne

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id 228NrTUS024030 On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 10:32:51 -0500 Philippe Debanne wrote: > sorry for the delay.  I don't manage the server in question, so I can't > call 'smbstatus' directly on it, but if it's any indication of version > there is a path : > > /usr/share/doc/samba-4.10.16/ > > Also, attached is the /etc/smb.conf file, somewhat redacted. I installed CentOS 7 with samba 4.10.16, and add following section to /etc/samba/smb.conf which is similar section to one in smb.conf you had provided. [share$] comment = Test share path = /home/share valud users = @yano force group = yano read only = No create mask 0660 directory mask = 0770 However, the issue could not be reproduced. If I provide you with a test cygwin1.dll that outputs debug messages, can you try it out? -- Takashi Yano -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple