X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D29F93858C2C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1646164048; bh=EMzIGLTtTGoWRflYubPgEL6OJ8SClEbVWIC1Ylo7gg4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Reply-To:From; b=EUNEnjodSBT0Xz4ak7mtUcjVQtFZ2XCe4eanXlVd3eUcc9DTs1cAlVMTw4/BQmEPG T4AvWoYIG/csvpVTNhuaBD47DSlP4I6IEc9t45+f1v7nxZ9pUXZiwdHu8inmxRY/Ns vHuqbNdUmTT+Wpla1wQVnDSb8dLbRZmeNoGEKzu4= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D1A7B3858C78 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=cygwin.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=cygwin.com Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 20:46:54 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Values for SigBlk and SigIgn are zero in /proc/$$/status Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:7U3XolFYkWYTzNNiuaj9YDj6cj9H3vvfZovcFxwOAeBbDoSE9jk jJ5xqeaPpBcR3sDuPwT/ja0m7V+cGMiaoWfIeXhPh9qC4vT5QzVFJ7uMMwfTZtghTng6LJu bGngqFsqqSVXQ70loOTDWKQh65SPKzRZzRcwTzb351ofRkFRgxSUSusWbUKkUGKUpNTQ1ES 7nG/RLmdFo1KCKgrpn9gw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:7KBOuxdAW2Q=:JJ2YfBxICoP92etWFMKrj/ lIQ/I7ktaWNMs/0MHQNN1k4hKUN/mautJaach2sfttwePFfewTbmCkO3nhvxEKG4JGB05RjNY EW5Gya8IJilODMMtmk/V88YUVhDHS9lpcxACtZMyvtcokA8G/GlSkPEJ/ua5pbcqjXyMnynnH gQrpQxKSApO0HOpCQpanouQ8u0Al3Mvl8C/o0vDDqtbQB7uHSnKeJAE7XLfINpE3PbVdysnUA EBWeZQJpdOIwldBsIULzQzjOKKxiHm8tcP/Nhu4b2IENjaq/k/G+vuFaLeAfo/OiRnWjAatZY bXIN+SZmwXPT4sWQgcjxgbjvcjUizpkqo+fZIVTahiIrxNsJPXOGleVD2kYvEKQXR1nW7Zws2 sBZVhzlNRQ6HnTKhrCfgIUKUni2RZWBfM75Sie3EI55qG3RPdNuXK63RTm8U6fpQMcARdAi5v wTr0Z6ZOhaTyQJvroEj0zO7O7FLyFHAKnm4QpW45b5eyYsZWUlamcLHrskv/acxS6fzIB/dGR LqEXPp5Z3PQrL+bQ2p7zCWNCd7TXc7RNio7sJmSGAiqlfRkFSKyWiQtuHQrkUHbO+auEx6zcM SUjOHZyhSgfgG4mCmZV//OjZCZ0UO5wEpmxcmCEPAN5IJvEnAr0Z+onUTe020+8JxjNrsqpFd mjlceCF+etoTmf0lr3Q9t/DZ1ytknv/c5sQrOZKwcDqRCxJCBLKDURcjlT/07BTiXhkbnJv+x gICYRpEEWST3crgb X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GOOD_FROM_CORINNA_CYGWIN, KAM_DMARC_NONE, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_FAIL, SPF_HELO_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces+archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Mar 1 12:06, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 1 14:35, Ken SATO wrote: > > Hello, > > > > When I run the following command, the values for SigBlk and SigIgn are zero. > > How can I get the correct value? > > You can't. We don't have the information readily available without > asking the process itself. While we have a communication mechanism > in place for stuff like that, it's not used yet for signal info. > > It's something we can think about for 3.4, though. I had a few spare cycles today so I took a stab at it and implemented it. I uploaded new developer snapshots to https://cygwin.com/snapshots/, please give it a try. Thanks, Corinna -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple