X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2590B3943403 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cygwin.com; s=default; t=1621444935; bh=DAhVOEy6vcVbLBKp8zp0pHElX+JKrfEyvtV6Zpr4y7s=; h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To: From; b=n3hJPn4OkESNyEOnXCx4uvDmOXebJn/dh8ZgeWevVrWWyKdFFzAtFNbTGawn1xNX2 B0WuwP4FIHvg2s6d/gr1oykw79qlbWCqjs7rF9/bOT6R3LsFqKcyWVXoZo2G4g/jMo wA+GB8PPtcc5ofCoz+h6VV2nV6bYdX+LtKn7K7sc= X-Original-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 86E77386FC00 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-06.nifty.com 14JHLZgR025008 X-Nifty-SrcIP: [118.243.84.232] Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 02:21:38 +0900 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openblas-0.3.14-1 Message-Id: <20210520022138.0ea95c61aa19bd48313f4849@nifty.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: References: <20210519181218 DOT de23e36e1fcec21656f274a6 AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> <07f0d952-50ae-6f77-68e2-d7afe202e189 AT gmail DOT com> <20210519232536 DOT aa90bcb1d6986af74b0d865f AT nifty DOT ne DOT jp> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Cygwin discussions and problem reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Takashi Yano via Cygwin Reply-To: Takashi Yano Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: cygwin-bounces AT cygwin DOT com Sender: "Cygwin" On Wed, 19 May 2021 18:24:56 +0200 Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 19.05.2021 16:25, Takashi Yano wrote: > > Hi, Marco > > > I have built openblas 0.3.15 locally, and confirmed that > > it works fine with Core i7 870 (Lynnfield). > > > > I will test it if you provide the test version of 0.3.15. > > > > P.S. > > The same issue happnes also with Xeon X5680 and v0.3.14. > > Hi Takashi > > the 64bit 0.3.15 is up. > 32 bit version will follow I have confirmed that the issue has been fixed in v0.3.15. Thank you for the quick response. -- Takashi Yano -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: https://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple