X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=WzHbdtL
	97bIIaSNrF1GLhg2CoNt9m5O0mslqdLh8rWVpgxRgKwOhyqJHSu0MIud6Immi913
	+TkhhGAsB3MBMnq4jP7uKPax5syGMt25+NgwlU3qeUMKz8LL0QXZROw5/KflgOvh
	ClmlxVQEdSa4vY6FE4fvbu9bpTM6n3MTJM2Q=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=default; bh=i3qrh6rrz8qmt
	PGKT72dT0CCpaw=; b=pkNb55P+2e3gm73I7c5rsx5aA+YcbbmgtS/SF128Twj2X
	GtngiCckKHBWrZJbpiVC7tTVrDjaAj/yweW1KCrFSGqxZ3rHn7g2SUGgSdTkAppS
	BbvF0yxUl4MMtgGFFiIfahRTrXR+RE88ElG4xtUJtZxplEzFyJ6BXhjS1wTmX0=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=brian, D*ca, Brian
X-HELO: mail-lj1-f169.google.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;        bh=zH0nCiOr4G7nZ9qEKqdEWudcocc2bF87hY8gZG1XAX8=;        b=Dsq+SFDkH8rn+Bk38gawaFXAWhI6xXFOTB2otltAD9HiYzFr/2jRALxZN1Qj4jdVYq         QrvJ2qVm/AG6MlyXwetJIbPSUL5GXTQgznktPtykpQi1qfuzsuMEXNJodJaUfrgvvFa5         DEotRH1otR4kBVX5qEtoeVuqc8m/t6qEqCF7xSBtG826yIcLaNRrSza/qlnPFoMLWH9M         NQYC+ZivkZdXFy6opOR03Q0HKK0vMTfa0JOHl2gHvqAAeayYI8x4ctN9tEPJh0NQvVEJ         O3RyOjkhjxIT4VRadID+yqVEKmg9ykRgPCWEtLgNBGUqPqkSNE+y/Lp443Bo2qy9wd6G         hOGA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <865cfe26-a3ca-e23f-0ffa-16f7db6a3dfb@SystematicSw.ab.ca>
References: <2B3187EFB48B477183C355EDF9660136 AT W340> <1444436439 DOT 20180805170441 AT yandex DOT ru> <3AA6B0E5761945E58833642A6DB75341 AT W340> <865cfe26-a3ca-e23f-0ffa-16f7db6a3dfb AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>
From: R0b0t1 <r030t1 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 14:15:52 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAD4mYhFHaQA4CeirCqCzR5NH=wRuXp4YqEzJGkzrUvZBYxKSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Cygwin's ACL handling is NOT interoperable with Windows
To: Brian DOT Inglis AT systematicsw DOT ab DOT ca, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Brian Inglis
<Brian DOT Inglis AT systematicsw DOT ab DOT ca> wrote:
>
> Please feel free to provide, using your superior understanding, a detailed spec
> for how POSIX ACLs and permissions should be implemented using Windows ACLs
> while maintaining "canonical" ACL order.

Or at the very least can another explanation of what is wrong be
offered? I still don't get it.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple