X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=ovtbxRwgHJ4bwpM3sirBj0DIEtieq mMVt1tviqGzurGRUQSNn5H6AdOOeD8msb8N+62zkKzsY4u/u/+vpxy21WKWbL56f jJxvp3CcYwsw0iz5a+27JHmyPB3otTovlgl/b9P0w3mr/z4tRbHLYJO+xeGaozOZ HVWdm90EL4/dOo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; s=default; bh=phFC+47BoV1/3wj+it9LtVqdT8U=; b=R7c t9FsjOeXF3FzzECCYU1hye+3uW0IRma7cuIripA9ed9e5LuW96wJ+cKKWh2ejjU1 fAadLJyi/IVHfjhQ7VK8w5KcIgzF3BZlI88QpI0q8hHoq60LGW9SgYmphoGJTz1e TXYltVluNr9yFJ2WMqaO617LVO1Y3ErBbk450uTU= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=op's, ages, unzip, 2.10 X-HELO: outmail148161.authsmtp.com From: David Allsopp To: Lee , "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Subject: RE: setup -g ??? Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2018 10:07:45 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Server-Quench: 33c35dc3-2a94-11e8-9f3c-9cb654bb2504 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd1ZAARAlZ5RRob BmUtCCtbTh09DhZI RxQKKE1TKxwUVhJU L0JGL0JXPR1GBEcA C3l2ChZLUl1wUXN0 awBRag9ZZgRMXgZ0 UUhMXFBTFhtpABge BBsBU1c1dXw3fyYN A0ZgV3lTXwp7cUN+ RABXFj4FYDMza30d AUlcagJVJQtXd0lG OU12ByELZGFVNHhl R1MlBR1jdS5SNDlN CkQCZQVFFi4I X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633634383431.1039:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 213.105.212.114/25 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id w2IA80e3012638 Lee wrote: > On 3/14/18, David Allsopp wrote: > > [reformatted for top-posting] > > > > Lee wrote: > >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >> > From: Jon Turney > >> > Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 15:26:27 +0000 > >> > Subject: Re: Problem running the latest python2-2.7.14-1 under > >> > AppVeyor > >> > To: The Cygwin Mailing List > >> > > >> > On 03/11/2017 14:45, Vadim Zeitlin wrote: > >> > > Our build has started on AppVeyor, a continuous integration > >> > > provider, started failing since a couple of days as a makefile > >> > > command running a Python script started failing with exit code > >> > > 127 without any more information. This is a strange situation as > >> > > I can't reproduce the problem locally, but something definitely > >> > > seems to be wrong with this package on the AppVeyor machine as > >> > > Python just doesn't seem to be executable, e.g. the output of > >> > > these commands in our batch file > >> > driving the build: > >> > > >> > Perhaps you need to provide the -g (--upgrade-also) flag to > >> > cygwin's setup. > >> > > >> > Due to setup terribleness, without this flag, it will install the > >> > requested packages, and any missing dependencies of them, but not > >> > upgrade any of the dependencies which are already installed to the > >> > current (and perhaps needed) version... > >> > > >> > See also [1]. > >> > > >> > [1] https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2017-03/msg00365.html > >> > >> Should we still be using the -g (--upgrade-also) flag on setup? > > > > I believe so (or at least hope so). > > So if I run setup and it says there are no pending updates it might be > lying to me? > > I need to run setup -g and only then if there are no pending updates do > I know that my cygwin installation is up to date? No - the original question here was about running setup with a command line and the --packages argument. If you run setup interactively (with no arguments), you should be told if any packages need upgrading, just as before, without needing -g. My assumption is that the new dependency solver means that installing a package with --packages should install that and upgrade *only* required dependencies, not the entire system. The OP's issue here with AppVeyor is one I see too, because the AppVeyor team are relatively slow to update the Cygwin installation in their images (that's their call, of course). However, I workaround that using a script which installs required packages and then tests a known command from the package with --version - if I get a non-zero exit code, then I know that the package probably depends on a newer Cygwin DLL and the whole system needs upgrading. For example, quoting https://ci.appveyor.com/project/dra27/opam/build/1.0.210/job/21p7e382hp3q9lh7#L11: > Cygwin package patch will be installed > Cygwin package unzip will be installed > Cygwin package vim will be installed > Cygwin package flexdll will be installed << at this point, the script will have run setup with --packages=patch,unzip,vim,flexdll >> > Cygwin Package Information > Package Version > curl 7.56.1-1 > cygwin 2.9.0-3 > diffutils 3.5-2 > flexdll 0.35-2 > gcc-g++ 6.4.0-4 > make 4.2.1-2 > patch 2.7.4-1 > tar 1.29-1 > unzip 6.0-17 > vim 8.0.1567-1 > Cygwin package upgrade required - please go and drink coffee << at this point, the script runs setup a second time with --upgrade-also >> > Cygwin Package Information > Package Version > curl 7.56.1-1 > cygwin 2.10.0-1 > diffutils 3.5-2 > flexdll 0.35-2 > gcc-g++ 6.4.0-5 > make 4.2.1-2 > patch 2.7.4-1 > tar 1.29-1 > unzip 6.0-17 > vim 8.0.1567-1 This build was on March 11th, and the problem package was Vim - the patch, unzip and flexdll packages hadn't been recompiled against Cygwin 2.10 and so could be installed without a full package upgrade. You can see from my message about coffee why I'd care if -g had become the default, because it takes ages to run (obviously), and I don't want my CI slowed down unnecessarily... David -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple