X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:reply-to:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=g9nB86XJcUp0gJKC 6WP5eMj7DWswMOTqJ4/hnfWH3Tuw0eUoUbnSSphCvBSCsYdRUH4qMx/8kbwfl8wY QgG0rRDbrz2Qm/79Gt20wcUDvE+0DGXLe5ql8Q9VitNBUBfkRPLua2oYVFJDrog6 PhG/lSL6NpBtXa9EcwsHrowyKfQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:reply-to:message-id :date:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=ykRZHgz1ddpQFCFv64EatQ azIdY=; b=IYtWkGWCmdLGT1CzOk8oa7KXk6uCOTu3xj1dNy5J8Xjv6kcShuwdrg eXS03ZGEKo7r5qDOaw/Ehq6PcFAmFzF9RWyVhZOcoaKsarFFk8BakJpJCaTwX5xz /FqM4m1dfUobA4uamqNfVGLS7JR4mOZPnbET01jGuj79huuIKD+hw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=assumptions, H*R:D*cygwin.com, you!, HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit X-HELO: mail-io0-f193.google.com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:reply-to:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1MNJ4pCUMuEaxkViSyk5cywXmr9vuutuOD/c0CC0DKE=; b=s5ddkOdBwG7ymy5GNSoradDckSbtOMcqJtH699Ls9UvycvRe/DSVlWkfBQSWfJS167 EpMCmneavTSzoXH5mmssESZBQkpSup4B418no5OGu09nCRhZYp70MVFI9uShNDSuuiux 5BvA7GmI441/AXCqbIuxCcw2J8TsXqDRlvUrjFtwdH+g4wT3fQONgIxG0D5VRYR4cOBA 5pgHMFxveONlqvX5ZR25QwxfOR1b/M9xj4/OJAk//az+Z3xiAAp6Pnq2H3rAp0tCb7Xp xrPyV7af7IWBHgNCR4aZOl51OOocaQV0RWpKvScI7qSncZzKMAAexbbZ7jv++Vd5+0mq KLaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaW+eV7sGBRpzMfT3dnXCbfOqpfvxS4+smCXagWlBbHCcxHtWUMr OQDYRSgFTEQ9jXSTeBTcrWADaw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RwhnRovmHAM4x65Xc/cBD+qIl8wDt7/GY3uSukEjyEjIOHJ/VBCz3U36CEccfe6UTa/Kyujg== X-Received: by 10.107.84.3 with SMTP id i3mr3593104iob.148.1508446810679; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 14:00:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Which is it -pc- or -unknown- To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <7983d97c-3c6d-e3c2-2304-9527ad4c5735 AT gmail DOT com> <59e8f0cd DOT 28279d0a DOT 292b DOT 4768 AT mx DOT google DOT com> <8a790ade-1761-b87b-b389-5f76d147c099 AT cygwin DOT com> <217068b0-f4df-1c30-07f7-8d7cbf84a52a AT SystematicSw DOT ab DOT ca>

From: cyg Simple Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:00:12 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 10/19/2017 4:35 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-10-19 15:02, cyg Simple wrote: >> On 10/19/2017 3:54 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: >>> On 2017-10-19 12:59, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >>>> On 2017-10-19 13:40, cyg Simple wrote: >>>>> x86_64-pc-cygwin is just not correct regardless of the lack of past issues. >>>> >>>> As I have said several times, this assertion is incorrect. You need to >>>> use the triplet which matches the toolchain with which you are building. >>>> For example, Fedora and RHEL all use $arch-redhat-linux as their >>>> triplet, and there is nothing wrong with that. >>> >>> Vendor -unknown- is just a default in various config cases, so specifying -pc- >>> for consistency on Cygwin builds is a valid choice by the maintainers. >> >> FINE! But config.guess should match the CHOSEN one. > > Incorrect assumption. > You keep saying my assumption is incorrect but that isn't the case. My assumption is based on data supplied by the configure process. >>> Perhaps a statement on the cygwin-apps list could clarify what should be done by >>> maintainers to ensure this override, and maybe retire the use of -unknown- by >>> any Cygwin apps in future, with a notice to this (cygwin) list for those who >>> choose to build packages from net sources. >> >> I don't care which is used as long as config.guess matches what is chosen. > > That is not a requirement. > >>> Perhaps also patches should be submitted to the config and automake maintainers >>> to ensure that {i*,x86_64}:CYGWIN*:*... always produce vendor -pc-. Not sure >>> about vendors for {amd64,powerpcle}:CYGWIN*:*... in config.guess, which are >>> currently also set to -unknown-. >> >> Exactly what I'm saying. It needs to match what is being distributed >> just for consistency and to avoid confusion. > > No patch is needed here. So says you! The vendor portion has been agreed to be -pc- and it isn't -unknown-, a patch then should be created for config.guess to match the agreed upon vendor. The config.guess script supplies the default to configure for the build and host. The fact that config.guess supplies x86_64-unknown-cygwin is used by configure is the reason my assumptions are correct. If -pc- should be used then config.guess needs to change. -- cyg Simple -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple