DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=YJQExUNan/hpLXeM9OmS7BKU/ZT2G9BCAciCfZastyGQnaZG6Y4Mw
	zFGv5CCq3gRqN0IVE2ynIzQyovDP+EFNkg/U6FELXYsL+QhbW6qQyo0Sh58PJIcJ
	H4HbFsqlssjkHsj0o6pnUqhiOYxAZiyk4jcrIvhW64eCMhqrmbugMg=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 19:02:54 +0200
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Signal delivered while blocked
Message-ID: <20170804170254.GM25551@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20170804074445 DOT GB3154757 AT rfd DOT leadboat DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZOudaV4lSIjFTlHv"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170804074445.GB3154757@rfd.leadboat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)

--ZOudaV4lSIjFTlHv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Aug  4 00:44, Noah Misch wrote:
> The attached demonstration program blocks signals (with sigprocmask()) to
> achieve mutual exclusion between signal handlers.  It aborts upon receipt=
 of a
> blocked signal.  On "CYGWIN_NT-10.0 2.7.0(0.306/5/3) 2017-02-12 13:18 x86=
_64",
> signals regularly arrive despite being blocked.  Essential parts of the
> program include handling two signal numbers and having handlers run for at
> least 1-2ms; this problem goes away if I remove one of those attributes.
> GNU/Linux, AIX, Solaris, and "CYGWIN_NT-6.0 1.7.27(0.271/5/3) 2013-12-09 =
11:57
> i686" never deliver a blocked signal to this program.  I think this Cygwin
> behavior is non-conforming.

Thanks for the testcase.  I debugged this a while today but the problem
is far from trivial, apparently.  Don't hold your breath for a quick
solution.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--ZOudaV4lSIjFTlHv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=yK8B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZOudaV4lSIjFTlHv--