X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=hQNG
	zqUEXNE+xycck2qVLtAb6M6dOjYa14RBmiJX8InLaGrilphGpJTGZXSqgKjTN9QI
	bYjyc8FWZfDLlmWGgMmHv3vJmefNNr6/LUlWK/7pIjkJow6aV/yLqxMutIbPUAtm
	qZVpP8jceDMDHEFmzDuMiHLFeyjH9XxYdDPtn0Y=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=vffM2OBWnF
	HVRDSmqb7yYRzx27c=; b=i3oEy4qwcgSluIwryIDTynGYHbozCKe6ybhpa7JPSF
	T3MFWAF7/2t47maPUiyf9RCjPj4dkCp/HzVRPliA60NJ4SHgjFymZFmDYkYhNdMn
	v7vz8HYT4CQ2bph3g0eUf6w9bgiBlwOrAp/7nvcdvRlwYFR0NwNV+F75TcGk8gtC
	w=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=she, month, announcement, H*c:application
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 3212812F3C
Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=eblake AT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: libreadline7-7.0.3-3
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20170801144830 DOT GC25551 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <5980c675 DOT 16ccca0a DOT ad0cc DOT f01e AT mx DOT google DOT com> <87d18fktkd DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
From: Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com>
Openpgp: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg
Message-ID: <cdfa7759-a2ff-9375-076b-c1bb903922cf@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 14:02:14 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87d18fktkd.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uUTEH0HGVH02kAPc3mfF53oEwC03JgKDe"
X-IsSubscribed: yes

--uUTEH0HGVH02kAPc3mfF53oEwC03JgKDe
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Fi3MW7Bsa5U5btj1hT2DJfeWSqs2U6Pk5";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Eric Blake <eblake AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <cdfa7759-a2ff-9375-076b-c1bb903922cf AT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: libreadline7-7.0.3-3
References: <20170801144830 DOT GC25551 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
 <5980c675 DOT 16ccca0a DOT ad0cc DOT f01e AT mx DOT google DOT com> <87d18fktkd DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>
In-Reply-To: <87d18fktkd DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid>


--Fi3MW7Bsa5U5btj1hT2DJfeWSqs2U6Pk5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 08/01/2017 01:54 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Steven Penny writes:
>> Could you link to Davids post? I do not see it for this month or July, a=
nd I
>> dont seem to have trouble with numlock on or off, even with July 31 vers=
ion.
>=20
> She can't, this was a discussion on IRC.

The gist of the conversation and today's patch: when numlock is on,
'alt-5' behaves as expected; but when numlock is off, 'alt-5' was
generating two keypresses at once (the escape sequence for ALT+keypad5
as on Linux when you release keypad5, AND the windows behavior of
injecting a codepoint after releasing alt).  Corinna's patch means you
can no longer bind alt-keypad5 to do something magic (this is because
the cmd behavior is that alt-keypad sequences work regardless of numlock
state); but doesn't stop you from binding ctrl-keypad5 or shift-keypad5.
 Yes, it means one place where cygwin can't completely emulate Linux;
but the thought on IRC was that more users are probably familiar with
windows alt-sequence codepoint generation than they are with Linux
alt-keypress bindings, and that less than 1% of the population would
even notice the difference.

--=20
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org


--Fi3MW7Bsa5U5btj1hT2DJfeWSqs2U6Pk5--

--uUTEH0HGVH02kAPc3mfF53oEwC03JgKDe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEccLMIrHEYCkn0vOqp6FrSiUnQ2oFAlmA0DYACgkQp6FrSiUn
Q2qoagf+OAMEVe7xQfR/eWOflxjF4KKmzEMplHQkPj+BKBshLEmud2EnvFqHBBCv
D+bcQiMwgVou9qmEXx4X/prkuY0bab7kBbIzQCQCsr5Yl4OQRapmi+//ad9QTduM
w616B0o4ZcE5GAqlv13yxWhvmUyedWTLy4dtcvZfBqXlE+15Wy8/QxDIMUPYpVCv
xPdulTQ8QcQ0GgQasOUBJPKlySXXurgHuGD9fjXfao93uZ+tJYY2ih0NYO0tKUsl
3f3dS8VQpPJzg7bpMAYizqabTKNLBQ1QUYpb1gF6wSbF7K5PZlIiBmfbab91hszd
kerVi8YaCRSLOwQBSKSwCvTe9qD5xg==
=6Tri
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--uUTEH0HGVH02kAPc3mfF53oEwC03JgKDe--