X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=KwazpVEiIVFCmk1wVPSfthg5pSXJw4CqYSMu21HSPYGlM/5dsPy+K y2O8KvJrEQQpixOkV+ATC0qQ4KIZac0sxdCq1RJaw/2/vZuxpojp1QFkQLyyIhuk srmNOkvTAhfKMfx4haYmJ+7pVzApKRu85GPwTprjPRijKs0r/IZidw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=W4g6S5wuZVlMpkVBLhli9kHr1SQ=; b=c/5G8uwEmCVMqCzcSIvx6C+foXO8 WR7y0nVlZJESMppmzRFYhTKbmhrIDo4lQIRg10BCaB9xWrB03CjbmUK/8qKzmitG Eu1pf7FETyHhhD5/N8do2YQyqqGe/41ubd1PsYfXAN63fOcLRb7+Rwij2LHSGxPZ jx78s2dhvH7UDTo= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_2,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=luck, H*r:sk:static-, Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:static-, H*RU:sk:static- X-HELO: smtp-nf-201.his.com X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1498531469-061c41114cd4fa0001-w5GHUG X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: tom AT invisible-island DOT net X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 216.194.196.20 X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 216.194.248.141 X-Barracuda-RBL-IP: 71.246.219.82 X-Barracuda-Effective-Source-IP: static-71-246-219-82.washdc.fios.verizon.net[71.246.219.82] X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 71.246.219.82 Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 21:01:23 -0400 From: Thomas Dickey To: Bryan Dongray Cc: Thomas Dickey , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: xterm 327-1 to 329-1 needs font dependency Message-ID: <20170627010123.GB101864@vmw-debian7-64.jexium-island.net> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: xterm 327-1 to 329-1 needs font dependency Reply-To: dickey AT his DOT com References: <1443046988 DOT 4371946 DOT 1498033321373 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT his DOT com> <1827d54f-e2b0-ef76-fe55-02b3897b4089 AT dongrays DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qcHopEYAB45HaUaB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1827d54f-e2b0-ef76-fe55-02b3897b4089@dongrays.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp-nf-202.his.com[216.194.196.20] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1498531469 X-Barracuda-URL: https://spam.his.com:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 2236 X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=7.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.40269 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:18:52AM -0700, Bryan Dongray wrote: > On 06/21/2017 01:22 AM, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > | From: "Bryan Dongray" > > | To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > > | Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 6:52:38 PM > > | Subject: xterm 327-1 to 329-1 needs font dependency > > |=20 > > | On an upgrade of xterm from 327-1 to 329-1 starting an xterm now > > | complains: > > | $ xterm > > | /usr/bin/xterm: cannot load font > > | "-Misc-Fixed-bold-R-*-*-10-100-75-75-C-60-ISO8859-1" > > | /usr/bin/xterm: cannot load font > > | "-Misc-Fixed-medium-R-*-*-10-100-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1" > > | /usr/bin/xterm: cannot load font > > | "-Misc-Fixed-bold-R-*-*-10-100-75-75-C-120-ISO10646-1" > > |=20 > > | When I downgrade to 327-1 these messages do not show, so I assume the > > | latest version requires specific fonts. no - there's no new font requirements. xterm has (for a long time) provided a way to infer what bold font would correspond to the normal fonts if there's no bold-font resource setting. One of the changes in #328 omitted a step in that process, making it fail to see that a bold font was specified. The warnings have been there for a few years. You simply got extra warnings due to the bug. As far as I know, #330 fixes that issue. > > |=20 > > | I installed all the X11 fonts which were described as "core font" > > | (surprisingly a reinstall of "xinit" did not install these), > > | but still I get the above messages. However I assume xterm falls back > > | on > > | some other font, as everything displays ok (as far as I checked). > > |=20 > > | Q1. Can someone point me at which font I need to install to not get > > | these > > | warnings (I tried a few, but no luck, and there are hundreds to > > | try)? > > |=20 > > | Q2. Shouldn't these fonts be a dependency of xterm? Some packagers don't think so. The ones that are used by default are the xorg "misc" fonts (though I don't recall what the package name in cygwin is -- package names for X fonts diff= er in every system that I've seen). --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAllRrmMACgkQcCNT4Pfkjttc5ACeIhpd4qGovB3ETsyxNV8wUqUG gI0AoIbpoiZpUKD0SESxTIHeg+y23uy1 =iElP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB--