X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=p7sSJqO/vt/N+Feg U8C6OZTGRqNWc+me4mGaqF9C/2oSVTkBhfDQrry5M2L1aoRqngEicOokBmnvofLZ ul8axvlE74/amm36+JpolwgL3SKn+DrVadFRR9hurq3QkqQEpdjmP2ykb1F3YJGc 1nUEyEeL+IvfvcvKez0M7nsBK/w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Sx1XBWu8GaOp5PpqLG34Un bVeVg=; b=o4kKTUBKGp96SjWXuV8dRixvqNvL5zgceoBU0jXBdZRKEf2AviwhN3 Q5Je65vNbB1YqNActMxQNj+8gkbOVy1+MeLXkvR6vZIsrFILGnxrF+oLD6DnIpM+ Kfju5x+zD+lVVvkkQQjdgyKoqLr+i51eImsAyQ7aNs44GDxpVgdUY= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*M:online, H*F:D*t-online.de X-HELO: mailout12.t-online.de Subject: Re: free() and implicit conversion to a function pointer (was: Use of initialized variable in strtod.c) References: To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: =?UTF-8?Q?Hans-Bernhard_Br=c3=b6ker?= X-Forwarded-Message-Id: Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 20:24:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes [Sorry, forgot to reply-all...] Am 15.03.2017 um 23:48 schrieb Jeffrey Walton: > Since Coverity is > complaining about an implicit conversion, maybe the following will > help to avoid the implicit part (and sidestep the finding): > > if (free != NULL) > break; > > Or perhaps: > > if ((void*)free != NULL) > break; Even setting aside that the latter should of course have been if ((void*)free == NULL) break; those are both worse than the original code. (void *) is _not_ suitable for use with function pointers. Neither is NULL in the general case, because it may very well be ((void *)0). The reason this is wrong is that C by design treats data and functions as living in separate realms, i.e. its virtual machine has a Harvard architecture. One of the consequences of this is that pointers to functions and pointers to data are incommensurable, i.e. any and all conversions or comparisons across this divide are wrong. (void *) are compatible to all data pointers, but not to function pointers. The only code that might actually be a slight bit better than the given if (! free) would be if (0 != free) The function designator `free' auto-decays into a function pointer, which is compared to a null pointer constant: 0. The ! operator does that same thing implicitly, but is fully equivalent to it. In other words: that message from Coverity is just _wrong_, so it _should_ be disabled. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple