X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=kvcb+2
	rGvvLXldtfc8wXYxs+Hs9c2v6uOwAahGrCq31FE1SbaEvieKDwt3NfZLOJkqFupB
	RH30tvFDOxSbz5FgTEdMxrPixri+sQVdx8sI106zmku5CfnAYo81+K/ts3SwgYfV
	Qp+KR81Nvz1t/30wx9/r+EGzYOue0qVgEnT+c=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=xHAMNoIAGEMO
	ByJqWBl2CJH7PRM=; b=ofVCv7azSMFNDHf29ayMRy8ldicG/lgqOvsEWkGpUITQ
	B0e2BIXVqhPyReiBUhXLy3JvQquTN+njHsHctzhr64HQuMjCHXwD6Kk3/X9Prpk8
	DxZqIWGNtB3NuQWlpuDo+VEwiiWTYyj0b+uSi56cyfmYePujU0CLpxLKXOoWLEw=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HTo:U*tony, violations, opensuse, similarlooking
X-HELO: mail-pf0-f176.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to         :subject:references:in-reply-to;        bh=fglwtIaYrFB/vfnWYEmry1z2c1Oy/6bb5CgdamyabBI=;        b=OyxUW+oxKiaiyC1ZvEfWL1FeKYuXZerTOa/VVnf4/6apSRr7xXsNli1+8s0YnAXHxu         6L0G8I+23REUykQ9p5St6qyN0pLJqQAEAlb8FT9h2CfKMW8l7zpXTyvf2SY7RmRoRo2O         vCF5TZEMwpHt1cxkWX//uRQMlPKEwAo7vPG539R0QFjbhX2E4ddySC6sqp7eIdP/wFge         vL5yVB8OiJqdvQu4H79GxkAI4jVAXkfqVA9milDYke3Fil+WRHMslhcKXKHwZJSs0GSh         qOp+ceA21NCHhlXicIZVZQI0GPhfeYrSnnISRomDGeZkYAg1Rlh9/YKyWKlKuIXu31wv         uXHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvwCOeh1qT2sntUh9RcRfswRn+KJ0JCBbyH1//rnJ73j3zoqPs3OzvdEByaWv4tyA==
X-Received: by 10.98.207.6 with SMTP id b6mr4525642pfg.25.1471530069527;        Thu, 18 Aug 2016 07:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <57B5C44B.4000108@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:20:59 +0800
From: JonY <10walls AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:25.4) Gecko/20150524 FossaMail/25.1.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tony Kelman <tony AT kelman DOT net>, "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-gcc-5.4.0-2 (x86/x86_64)
References: <announce DOT 57B25054 DOT 3020401 AT gmail DOT com> <DM2PR0201MB079940970D55C5E9019AA53DA7130 AT DM2PR0201MB0799 DOT namprd02 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>,<57B4EF9D DOT 9030903 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <DM2PR0201MB07990FA162A92324D6BF5B4FA7150 AT DM2PR0201MB0799 DOT namprd02 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>,<57B57F47 DOT 3030100 AT gmail DOT com>,<DM2PR0201MB0799E7D985236F0497437D56A7150 AT DM2PR0201MB0799 DOT namprd02 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com> <DM2PR0201MB07995B3B84C1DCE4FECAF11FA7150 AT DM2PR0201MB0799 DOT namprd02 DOT prod DOT outlook DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR0201MB07995B3B84C1DCE4FECAF11FA7150@DM2PR0201MB0799.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KawL1MebSqXGdkw175mb82RDHsP0jgN3N"
X-IsSubscribed: yes

--KawL1MebSqXGdkw175mb82RDHsP0jgN3N
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 8/18/2016 20:08, Tony Kelman wrote:
>> Sadly I seem to get similar-looking access violations even after rebuild=
ing
>> 5.4.0-2 from the -src cygport with the patch for GCC bug 66655 added. So
>> maybe some other change is also needed to get this working, hopefully one
>> that is included in GCC 6. I'll have to test a cross-compilation from
>> opensuse where they already have mingw-w64 GCC 6 packaged and see if thi=
ngs
>> are in a better shape there.
>=20
> I also get a segfault when I cross-compile with GCC 6.1 from opensuse 13.2
> (needs wine to run this particular bootstrap build step), so this looks
> like it's something else. To be sure, could you test the small ipa-ra.tgz
> test case from the top of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D=
66655
> with your build? It runs correctly with my build where I've applied the
> patch, but the larger Julia+LLVM case doesn't work. So this is something
> new, and/or https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D68601 wasn't
> actually a duplicate of 66655. Will continue investigating.
>=20
> -Tony
>=20
>=20

The -2 build already includes the patch on the 66655 link.



--KawL1MebSqXGdkw175mb82RDHsP0jgN3N
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXtcRRAAoJEHE7X+KcFF1F9kYP/jOw1vMDilG9VL/b93fNdS+Y
WkBBMQe65bIZH4KHINWf02HJlm14HrdAq6Xo82xYWMWu+2aioM5iL4uRhg8RF3Kj
ysbiuaLB/4tNP38Hkd4LK5vnMsY1svfYZ2UuKY0fl7w2ncQxPcW+ngImdnycBL1s
wu+Lck8jV08Zbkg8I3pQPuX9/wY5TjIruQGLNJPQm23AfmGBMnNDC9n3I3M3tFZO
Q8VLJpHnHDDaKEOsna4t1g8bZNEnO3Pvpcly3TVtUXXRcBV33YmWRklviFwdxNpd
sndJAHDV0aecze9TeULnhe5k4sBvaL5PDDzAnsMGTgjkNFM5v3OEc24BEV4Hvz4e
+Nm9uBntDmcwxKkVgAmwB0lGSb+oeqdAYnEYJGScefCwsRkriayl30AY/MVbIDcO
aYH8UUgnYbpQm6Zhk9tV1Oq7nc7S1ndNRWe2Dq16KK05BPeSPKktOWlpcMVplXgX
TL17L9HSXRWYSk9SkD3SHsb0bNi3XBafT9IPGV5h2pMmnekzrEOe/npq/lEJEAcu
RpFr9qkyrLgBCohuUTMxdlMhEe3s/R4Xa0wpwUteZumsq658p0jTg7qhwrST+PVh
bzqMV1VHOmRMtERUC8J3eMcKQvs3Ia5QVfoacAdGnU4q4oilXiNwaAHpbbQwDOs2
N38qOFJAcZYarAwHYur8
=DcQK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--KawL1MebSqXGdkw175mb82RDHsP0jgN3N--