X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=K0P3guDV6yiAH2E1 6K0t2hzHOh0Cu2XOH9nGWhScf0MGifBAz8EA4lEjmbrbKBtNCUrtq+PbMqbHjWAl /kWNzopuMt1jaToXZsiMjghlrMQjkCtMRvjQyiyULwQFa4wvTHfoZ0+xrW1khQbK 3T7eWZL5Lei9UzVcSMfQ/zZywb0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Abd7EJwtoZ5FoVLLloTlbo NxIrc=; b=n9EccHlq6HZsgAFbgxsyJNPRLYsACDAt3zMHsDlb1omb3JaAYX1kBx YxyJKvhALXvMouRLkoeYyFWwr0R377R5WP5o4JU4YuFtEUq7OwnMqK9uVOXal/kr qEWYwSFtzLsbK/bli9jlSl43SN5n7lWjWUsEOYRxgnxNrM7Nu1xZ0= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=andrey, Andrey, lostbits, listings X-HELO: nm16-vm6.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-SMTP: 0z5TJLmswBDohOc2QznCIeoaEiEalQiTSMLFNdKdTt4t Subject: Re: Possible issue with chown v8.25 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4dc470a5-6d19-348e-569b-81702aff8602 AT att DOT net> <626561572 DOT 20160516041656 AT yandex DOT ru> From: lostbits Message-ID: <8b64e8f5-8419-1ae2-05c1-d2fc64bb7218@att.net> Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 21:55:22 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <626561572.20160516041656@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Your English is fine - mine is problematical. What are icacls and getfacl listings? My problem is that after a chown the directories are inaccessible and/or I can not look at the Security property without getting a diagnostic. I have assumed that the diagnostic indicates an issue. I get the feeling that the diagnostic does not indicate a fault and that things should work fine. I just ran a minitest: > mkdir gg > touch gg/cc > chown -R : gg In the Explorer I get the same diagnostic on gg and the has no permissions. Is this the correct behavior (and if you tell me what icacls and getfacl listings I will provide them. art PS: Thanks On 5/15/2016 6:16 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, lostbits! > >> Click Reorder > Don't do that. > >> This corrects the error. > No, it breaks permissions. > >> For the directory and contained subdirectories, the is put into >> the "Group or user names" popup of the Security property. The >> has no assigned permissions. >> The contained files in the directory have in the "Group or user >> names" popup of the Security property. The has all permissions >> except special permissions. >> Summary: When the chown -R command is given, the ownership and group of >> the directory and contained files are changed but the permissions of the >> directory are detected as incorrect by Win7. > Don't confuse Explorer and OS itself. > >> The owner has no >> permissions in the directory but does have permissions in the files >> contained in the directory. >> I don't think that this is something that I caused through a fault of my >> own. It looks like a chown bug. Is there a workaround? > You didn't tell us, what is your problem. > You did not provide icacls and getfacl listings. > > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple