X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=SI NpKpkzgbftRNzFju4AnIzyIW+aEDgQomGGmUfuIenW5tksMozwJg7OD93jxBhDwX KEPvF7ZtPc/z25sp3aEP8T3XZnRDxDdLiLax2yaRP9PhJ73489f1pceen53xHQDQ 8VQvdicRqAfEd+JrkSIA9kncgNbLO6G8cdVl8z5HI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=+BHGkli3 LQqL2zLRjM+2TcwWEmw=; b=N+snBAoD93TQkWqj9zVKgziExKBSvoyYZT5qMdDe 8rLnhGa04OL9TECFTbXIe3WOFXRDMaBDKTDaPloe2c7SF63Km/YwiibHISh5+xKB iKP475/tFMTYlRACM2xLd8PuXPCswqTVPzvfw1owvaT6CyIKVdmVnaQwKjG3+HOt Vko= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wi0-f171.google.com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CwluAZDzAzrKFakuNyVGSTcm/4c/vgeY7gCMJyJkB+0=; b=XCu2WcF27Zs15u2t8F3fj6xakJmZo/6nCvnHYsyWoZybk8ZUvH6q1LUJUzaet99/vO tqIdKN93+nE9+Elr1/JTEpNbjrITDbbH+b89s0ESafWLxlu8Z7LlyANZg5t0P3TV/+RS e0IDMZAjBgzP+TfESYU/wHgcivUZgOmsBg6PvXX0ez7ZYKFuWwF4VU61SEAkghbi7kNt F9eY6Go0cLuUc3/KP2pBWmj/QkF3+iKf3Sdagv1jXKqjzAmnX3vjKD+V0wLtWPGrJhLW ECjWmnQ5htntndABL/cKsFk418lGW582wTWgi/V9WdlnJ8KFHp+6kmK+XvrV1oPyz56A iwfg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlPzGlcKPv15ZpmNQCc2magMEtE+H9UJpe2MmebDwDjjtnP77FWcbDfxB6q65ZCREFVZ7Sy MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.230.226 with SMTP id tb2mr4547969wic.64.1430392268254; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 04:11:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150430105644.GM3657@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <397346277 DOT 275101 DOT 1430383452664 DOT JavaMail DOT zimbra AT ceos DOT com DOT au> <20150430105644 DOT GM3657 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 04:11:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Trouble with Git 2.1.x pushing to repos over Samba From: Michael Enright To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Corinna, Do you think the snapshot would change the outcome in my case? I haven't used a snapshot before. Is there a tutorial on how to get onto and off of a snapshot? Or should I test by using a VM? I myself am going to be on a short vacation and compressing too much into tomorrow to do anything with a snapshot very soon. On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hi John, > > On Apr 30 18:44, John Orr wrote: >> > From: "Michael Enright" >> > $ git push origin master >> > fatal: '//host/path/to/repo.git/' does not appear to be a git repository >> > fatal: Could not read from remote repository. >> [...] >> #: john AT johndesktop:/cygdrive/l ; ls -ld .git/objects/ >> drwxr-xr-x 1 john Unix_Group+1000 0 Nov 13 14:13 .git/objects/ >> >> (albeit, Corinna, with my group issue still not yet resolved) > > You tried the /etc/group tweak as I suggested in my latest mail in that > thread, I take it? > >> access(/cygdrive/l/.git, R_OK) returned 0 >> access(/cygdrive/l/.git, W_OK) returned 0 >> access(/cygdrive/l/.git, X_OK) returned -1 >> >> The last test is the one run by git, that makes it reject my /cygdrive/l/.git directory. >> >> Not sure if that's relevant, but just in case. > > Thanks for the info. I found a really dumb bug in my code. The > access() function is using a Windows function for access checking under > the hood. To account for the Samba account mapping in Cygwin, there's > a function converting the S-1-22-x-y SIDs in the file's ACL to Windows > SIDs if there *is* a mapping. But I made a small mistake which has > a big result: The ACL is not completly copied over, thus the Windows > function has to deal with an incomplete ACL. > > I fixed that in the git repo and uploaded new snapshots to > https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ Please give them a try. Don't use the > snapshots for anything else for the time being! > > PLEASE TEST ASAP AND REPORT BACK! > > I'll be unavailable for a few weeks starting tomorrow, so I'd like to > do a bugfix Cygwin release, preferredly today, if this patch works as > desired. > > > Thanks, > Corinna > > > P.S.: As a side-note: While this patch (hopefully) reverts this code to > work as pre-1.7.34, it seems that the internal Windows access > check function is not quite up to the task for Samba shares in > scenarios as John's one. It will always report back the access of > the "others" part of POSIX permission bits. Only with the new > mapping of S-1-22-x-y SIDs to real WIndows accounts, or with > winbindd-supported mapping, the Windows access check will really > work as desired. > > -- > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to > Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple