X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=kY8Fmi0qkpWPEHgeWUscoDW1U4aB+99JbLsgxZtibdq D2kMkwqA6tFDqbNGHtSf+zAqFUsOA0zEqaUHReEIqyZxripMb6hkdHES/hgpbrsr TyoCxjeLdk23R8jFvPIHpZhGEJVajK3zoxKHtCVvZKIR67ofVZfSLz9OLzDBoXKg = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=PzFUr2mf9Pkj+fPfbuDBGrhWHVQ=; b=xrlWd8Hz4+MPLp7o3 lHf0nYkaiMXLudFwBiQrvWCIDFk/cBDF56ukUJAy9Cs3wVNPZmEqueZOa7/+3Rtw JMDP7qmXMZE+A4DqhmNhy2qLKdVbfuiYbk2fNFcD6gGyrcL8DuKo2kCbG/cVJo4B FZT0Jml7Z5i1D1oAy9+0+UwdBM= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: etr-usa.com Message-ID: <53155F96.3060400@etr-usa.com> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 22:07:34 -0700 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin References: <20140227094951 DOT GD2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140227134632 DOT GG2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <765945729 DOT 20140228031219 AT yandex DOT ru> <20140228120748 DOT GN2246 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <87y50vc910 DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <20140228201047 DOT GC2381 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140228210804 DOT GE2381 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140303092114 DOT GA26619 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1686957830 DOT 20140303195207 AT yandex DOT ru> <53152031 DOT 3000208 AT etr-usa DOT com> <397967999 DOT 20140304053603 AT yandex DOT ru> In-Reply-To: <397967999.20140304053603@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 3/3/2014 18:36, Andrey Repin wrote: > Once TCP session is established, it remains, > until closed or dropped on either end of the wire. Have you done the packet capture to prove that Windows does in fact keep the LDAP connection to the AD server up continually, or are you making an assumption? > Amount of packets doesn't matter Even if the connection stays up all the time, an LDAP lookup is almost certain to take more than one packet each way. Packet round trip time (RTT) varies by orders of magnitude among networks, from sub-ms on a fast, quiet LAN to on the order of a full second for a slow WAN. Since the number of packets is a function of the number of round trips, a network with an RTT of 0.9s will take more than the proposed 3 seconds to process a query that requires 4 round trips, even if the processing delay on either end is essentially 0. You have to measure it to find out. And yes, I have personally used networks with an RTT > 1.0s. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple