X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=Ettgy0VzVapqb/NbM59tA+BTcDA5pF mwiEC+WNgDRkLl+nxbBHa3M/AMhk8r2FhDkdmR0ffJsnTxSolBxfHZBTUXDNX/K+ mUizFXlzzrUw6eTTemK8cGhUkyzOv9xTx/ei5CkhO2kRj1i+2mahpWKDjEP7D/sG mNKJlEgxdnTYA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; s=default; bh=KgT0wFS4QeK4IMGF5XYn85hzauA=; b=FGtU vai/S0Fok9u6asx+v6+ildEwTAaLbGGwrnHWV0hpCQV+oqpUuiasUZAXppqEuJyK odviU9j8QXW2T+acLjuSqxc8SDfQO9WgCN4M+WlEqiHlo5TZ8sWXkXQhrmrDh3uK eVxSaLwwtrTeJmHJrJEgRg3xEhHmtUbD362/9Bw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Franz Fehringer Subject: Re: Updated: xorg-server-1.14.5-1 Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 15:31:59 +0100 Lines: 46 Message-ID: References: <52C1EBF4 DOT 9080303 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> <52C29A21 DOT 3060001 AT gmail DOT com> <52C2CDAC DOT 5090007 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: <52C2CDAC.5090007@dronecode.org.uk> X-IsSubscribed: yes Hi John, I will not send you further personal email. What i really meant was that i read in one of your announcements about clipboard integration not fully working with the 64bit X server. The reason why i came up with xwinclip is that i was under the (possibly wrong) impression that xwinclip reappeared as a consequence of this clipboard integration deficiency. So the real question is: Is it true that clipboard integration is not fully working with the 64bit X server and if so will this change in the foreseeable future? Thanks and best regards Franz Am 31.12.2013 14:59, schrieb Jon TURNEY: > On 31/12/2013 10:19, Franz Fehringer wrote: >> Hi John, > > Firstly, do not send me personal email. > > Please read http://cygwin.com/problems.html#personal-email, particularly the > section starting "Shouldn't I just send email to straight to a Cygwin > developer or package maintainer?" > >> It seems xwinclip is still needed, what are the perspectives about this? > > I don't understand what you are trying to say here. > > If you are assuming that xwinclip is normally needed, because it is provided, > then perhaps you should do some testing. It is not. > > See [1] and 'man xwinclip' for more details. > > To anticipate the next question: xwinclip is provided to assist in debugging > clipboard integration problems, and because it is useful with the experimental > XtoW window manager. > > If you are reporting a bug that xwinclip is needed when it shouldn't be, then > more information is needed. > > [1] http://x.cygwin.com/docs/ug/using-clipboard-integration.html > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple