X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=RQFgu9a5l9wOZDfP OBhpfq70ryjqY+LEAK5v4PzNDeLtE1ZLTKCtgRnPebBo8nf3OmQuG3aRi+EpA74d 3d+2y5+sbKFAZpCvtZ3rHxUJ/gR0dSAtaTbUE4j9sDirA6Rly2Z6f8kWdxVPbtgD Nh+Et45M3uHp8sfBUWdG5w3pYgY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=D6IF+/y0pnTOqe/Hp1C5jV aO1b8=; b=pqkAYCpb6KA/FTU1ydkaJRG6EfWUUj5n1ZktrS8eUBfYjDEti5bAMb nHFn0l0p48V+5RrhI3wL6U/KM4DZvTrYpBdw/sdf9Z5PezYrBqvlM3ivMiQnmgD0 FNnHcFOSeBCxrHQ4MtkC+GdaYZNcgc4FqaTtEFvof1VOeQHvxbFEc= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: vms173005pub.verizon.net Message-id: <5252E088.9030503@cygwin.com> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 12:25:44 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: second exec channel cannot access windows share (open-ssh) References: <524EF7EC DOT 8040204 AT cygwin DOT com> <52526B2A DOT 1080603 AT asperasoft DOT com> In-reply-to: <52526B2A.1080603@asperasoft.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 10/7/2013 4:04 AM, gaillard wrote: > Thanks. Yes there are passwords on shares. > > What confuses me is that it works on the first invocation of exec channel. > Is there any reason why it works then ? There are some corner cases where this might work for an individual user (i.e. the one that's running the service for instance). But those have limitations as well. My guess is you're seeing one of those corner cases. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple