X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=FZG5ZJyBlEmm6LUvgkBMOdLt2fDtQuiFyhbu0XkHpqt
	iasJU073QDDaDzGHxwWTofxy+P0OAQ271n19eBoY8I/GCfPYWAHgFK3sa4yiWQEq
	4TXoETnrMccdauoQKWkg3l07UZaGI8vgAc0WSqyiZWOgdqnVTk0GY122s8GdglYk
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=JWmtGCfFyUjpc9RTG4T0cTHgZMA=; b=no78NHxrqm80nfo4d
	bgHb2vMA5J8swPB6+J9ZkmE1aE0quR0csuEbrcCSSttv/OXVnlvI0S6NSKXygIH3
	+mATKPZpRpbRskbUiKCNbRRn4qZD0oRscuORit6HpMXuOiJpYYa+OdYEzJZWZV0e
	QEnU84h3P7wdCZUKGJb5oZUH8I=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Message-ID: <5217A6E8.4000109@etr-usa.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:16:08 -0600
From: Warren Young <warren AT etr-usa DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: .tar.xz for snapshots?
References: <52178DCF DOT 1000001 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20130823171546 DOT GA6035 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <CA+sc5mmg-9E+1q0CuxAFGfM36OOVtGruGnY8fdZW7MKwAPHJ0g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAFWoy7GD-0h3sf49tE3XULXhef4OGmCz_Cu5Hv7da2763JnvaQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20130823180918 DOT GA1584 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20130823181443 DOT GD2562 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <20130823181443.GD2562@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 8/23/2013 12:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 23 14:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:00:58PM -0600, Keith Christian wrote:
>>> Perhaps we should test to see whether we want to trade compression for time.
>>
>> The only time that the end-user has to worry about is download time +
>> uncompress time.  I think that the win with xz compression outweighs any
>> increase in uncompress time.
>
> Doesn't xz also have a faster uncompression than bzip2?

Yup: http://tukaani.org/lzma/benchmarks.html


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple