X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=bDkMaNI6llfHxgAGMViReUmQzUcDyVYJlQ7DyzvgkfJOFKilgDALm xMSLm+LuMLH9yH+keCx8+uWnvQ2VfochE6OtRUrRYpLXUOdmlHrOO5YYWLIXy0zW YGSGkxO4D+MMIhTL59cNY7cD30CMJHyOEHTHQUpzLORiNCK7Qn4K14= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=QDTWQ+20IFZMCvIbCMlk2X0+0PY=; b=iJhaySZMpP52CJPcTNwxCRjd2w5M MeQ46FuzUHIIT2/02qUmtxmC6HDd1x4ARGZxaB5x4BzHYsmpAf6wzXT0JOsfue4A XX4Gnijj8oXteFI3yUHNZFrzOjXRwjKVsB1L63OE5USjca81biQQZYWrkVWi6pdZ yqCc1GjwYZ0YQSA= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:05:41 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: redefinition of __fpending Message-ID: <20130812100541.GA2691@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Found: No --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Aug 11 09:20, Denis Excoffier wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I don't really know what is going on, but the new (since 1.7.23) __fpendi= ng() declaration > in /usr/include/stdio_def.h (line 47) seems to prevent the following to c= ompile (redefinition > of __fpending, i'm using GCC-4.8.1): > - m4-1.4.16 > - grep-2.14 > - findutils-4.5.11 >=20 > These packages use fpending.c from gnulib. Big sigh. The gnulib-related configure test checks for the declaration of __fpending, but the build environment still tries to compile gnulib's fpending.c. But __fpending is defined as inline function in stdio_ext.h so the definition in fpending.c clashes with the one in stdio_ext.h. That's a bug in the gnulib build environment. The definition of __fpending should be skipped if HAVE_DECL___FPENDING is 1. The problem is that this doesn't really help us a lot since all packages with integrated gnulib are affected. I'm not sure how to fix this yet. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSCLN1AAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gX2kP/2AHnfObl95Jz+mUdADjo8bq tW0CNH7FQXFQ2oJeot4dA8uZpvLwf/QtnrVHMi2OPIOihHM8RI0DIzWe0G0o7nj5 DPP7Kgx2c+PdcbRe4p5GFsuIzDKbGxGW0H9dSIbt6KHEkD+lHA1Suq+t5D/QvEeI 8yEY9em4A4AyuaX5JLSEVO/TjNU8O5pdgyZ3N0mf5HUEmBhig0NJCf9KLcLYKtxp tWA36euz3IlRrCSRoris3LzoAIr2FbOP0nc9v/A+W3BorRNqOhnuDkZVQLQTbme7 HJZ/rGy7lp5OkCvgDMgwAdViDqDcdiWAVgLeR1aEmsUY62Va8G8KW4MnRUng0Gqq keDjLzaoufAUDulApotXO6HfANURCvHF2QFUUk/yoWkgS38qyjllSGjoz1yVmU6A NhnUa4XzMym2/UWnoJae4Hm0AclhNwtxItEk++HiavIAuIE2a1Zw15ht0PITYJPm fVFRZRvbCEGoPE6Eo9bVWRx/0EyH78L0kDkZlVkWmaGkuPuRvSIbLtCjVgwHdde9 8P7+Dwh4QwpDO99NUpqHtygIqr3J+YEYRpDOqmPkladPTMp2keb8jVKLc9f0idWI GgXIwNbo6UqK6euqzAYR5MNR/sNsf+AXu/T9YKnIrNhJWv0lcC9i4JHRPtZsf8bK frFZlUmevrf3U86AqYJk =Uh/K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--