DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=dlm9MymmGWZhJxMHnIUfFrWMdga4Yng3BHJN2JKNFwfjy1RCKagya
	6FnhCMLmaH1TmgEBFsqywIO/Y6ltSopezTGhI1KS+lSfGqE5vypTGVyuVcRZ/ylp
	RIAVUv2BfYIpoRHsN5JDEZ8mKJ31ab2RhnuIBLkuFLBb5b+CU+pp6E=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:38:46 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 1.7.20: cygicons-0.dll has gone missing
Message-ID: <20130628143846.GA5630@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <6CF2FC1279D0844C9357664DC5A08BA20D913A AT MLBXV06 DOT nih DOT gov> <0D835E9B9CD07F40A48423F80D3B5A7021D8C894 AT USA7109MB022 DOT na DOT xerox DOT net> <51CC3936 DOT 5060302 AT gmail DOT com> <257023591 DOT 20130628141617 AT mtu-net DOT ru> <51CD9C39 DOT 8000907 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51CD9C39.8000907@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:22:49AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>On 6/28/2013 6:16 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
>>>>> The cygutils package was recently split into cygutils-extra and
>>>>> cygutils-x11.  Install cygutils-extra.
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't this suggest that cygicons-0.dll should be included
>>>> in the base cygwin package?
>>
>>> base does not needs icons, so in IMHO no.
>>
>> That's a bit flawed line, IMO.
>> Default install should put user's system in a consistent working order.
>> Missing icons is not something I would call "consistent".
>
>What part of a default install [1] *requires* icons from cygicon-0.dll? 
>  Now, if you're talking about updating an existing cygwin installation 
>via setup.exe [with no special package selection], then yeah -- this is 
>a *known* breakage.  But it's better than the previous *known issue* 
>where a default "Base" install [1] would pull in python and bits of X11. 
>  THAT is what this packaging change was intended to fix, and because we 
>did so deliberately in order to break requires: dependencies, we 
>couldn't very well avoid the problem you see by adding those same 
>requires: dependencies right back.
>
>Summary: READ the cygwin-announce list. Always. KNOW what you're doing 
>when you upgrade.  AND, if you didn't do that...when you see an error 
>due to a "routine upgrade"...go back and DO read that list.
>
>[1] And by "default install" I mean "new installation of cygwin, using 
>setup.exe, on a virgin system that has never before had cygwin 
>installed", where NO special package selection is made.  E.g. a "Base" 
>installation.
>
>And really, missing icons doesn't break a darn thing. It just makes 
>things look less pretty, temporarily, until you manually install the 
>correct package.

What he said.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple