X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=IESlvEzAYpSyr0WJs8uW22ViasLA1z/tAaXXdTXjI97kaKZ/r6w6B bjJwxeTeswkBt/AaXDUZC94bYy0HavW4ECFR2vMwc3SnDOiKKOJKlxdbZvYIyviv SX6KCMaz9laNPAOlE9wzEtxMxvhRkau1gOpvzZneOj+dOMfwIxFZU0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=mOLmeAmZuOlUqMdPF82sv5YR8a0=; b=FeqjNE1ynpFk2PHTimFFd9T8bPAu q9has9V+KFqGXetM3j5Jubquw0Nv8xSDlCJQ1rDlBPpDBjkmxfxqQbs3fSqOIK7W vRjoib3UMfFB9hm0GU/rTvS7Ob4zgWT15sG9F1nREPaFqhb53JUW17UgvY2TrEv1 V3iSnqYfg2t0WGk= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:12:44 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Adding MSYS functionality to Cygwin Message-ID: <20130620131244.GA19529@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <51C0B08E DOT 8080900 AT etr-usa DOT com> <51C0D956 DOT 4090905 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20130619020234 DOT GA3669 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <51C1EAA3 DOT 6040307 AT etr-usa DOT com> <20130619174514 DOT GA6071 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <51C213B4 DOT 1030503 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) On Jun 20 09:07, Earnie Boyd wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Charles Wilson wrote: > > > > I assume that, eventually and as-needed, a *small* number of additional > > "hooks" could be added to other code paths than exec/spawn/etc -- such as > > the aforementioned uname(3) thing. (One of the "deltas" between cygwin and > > msys was msys used a really stupid ownership/permission model -- pretend > > current user owns everything; check the DOS R/O bit for +w; check the file > > extension for +x; -- but this can be approximated with existing $CYGWIN > > entries or mount options. I think. So reimplementing that "feature" of MSYS > > would not require any additional hooks). > > IIRC that "stupid ownership/permission model" was a part of the > original Cygwin 1.3 and was not modified. CYGWIN=ntsec ruled way back when... Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple