X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=nMAjiM+mI7fO0QWCDx96YCuQ+AbsSmKSsIZWuvEUEC1 5OYvsV1kEcbMrroj75CQ64EVXip9Zw6vKDcNUSGceS6BwDHtOoEgTUZxh4FupPiC 5St29Wz+7R+mue9+XWwJnH9Gj4Bo0NCJY6Bo1SI3i88y/UW0lRLNfe5mXcFRR7LI = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=9qoK7Pzi/hXxj1XNPP0yDdA+/oA=; b=FaMXMGQvX4yQPz/iQ wJUaNYOmNMPPD0Jf3F9SgWELid19bUZP2ZljTbD1kvjdnTk8bIWYvxL2d68sIP+7 3SkHEHO0SR7KGkrXARvp3ZSbyRTyHloXA/iyWFudWJYWIc3IiNZYkzrzCncNtdvy 4WABrQ0dXGQ+F+9j1HZCN9+PD0= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS,TW_JL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Message-ID: <51B60877.1050608@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:10:15 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The Cygwin Mailing List Subject: Re: Fwd: Cygwin64: mkshortcut - Segmentation fault References: <51B5FC4C DOT 8010103 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20130610162514 DOT GC4149 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20130610162514.GC4149@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/10/2013 12:25 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 10 12:18, Charles Wilson wrote: >> However, it appears that rebaseall defaults to 0x70000000 regardless > > No, that's not right. rebaseall in the 64 bit distro defaults > to 0x4:00000000 where it belongs. See rebaseall lines 91ff. Oh, here's the problem. I assumed that the 32-bit package and the 64-bit package of rebase were both up-to-date. It seems the 64bit package is newer and those changes haven't yet prompted a 32bit update. 32bit 4.4.0-1 package: # $Id: rebaseall.in,v 1.9 2012/06/07 18:50:33 jlt63 Exp $ Current CVS and 64bit 4.4.0.1-1 package: # $Id: rebaseall.in,v 1.11 2013/02/18 10:04:43 yselkowitz Exp $ Sorry for the confusion. -- Chuck -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple