X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=DJtQK+EMSbJwpmaxcJaWcLZddkWi5yKDYJTrhkutf2Z /BbkKUlKzMzOSkh39tCfeW5cXtoapYRyT1x/Mpf5kY/AX1A5YYWVZRJgzXbcx/ck drWiIW4SD0i5z2/tuhdBgolwoM4F1IKn+5FVpKqOyqwqmjgIGGGfrKbZsynFIse0 = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=DERJNOSBkR9x4tLvNI4C03THdFU=; b=p3glCfZUMQ/Zfm3hz QPYdU9yvvVvnz1Vd8jZlIJL3G4TQItVNcHZdoWOeB0W5kLukZpaGZdJ2uigs8VXy kz8GQWUV4icspAaU3HXWCrnnw8FjOgGm+0tuc4ZQ75sU1lJZSuQt4DgjaA1dsrZ/ 8utvrBVtIldBpd+agBmuQ1E/Hk= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Message-ID: <51AF9AD4.80609@etr-usa.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:08:52 -0600 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin-L Subject: Re: [TEST] sqlite3-3.7.17-1 (Cygwin 1.7.19 locking feature) References: <51ACF886 DOT 10301 AT etr-usa DOT com> <51AD3BB4 DOT 2010601 AT acm DOT org> <87ip1s1hxh DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> In-Reply-To: <87ip1s1hxh.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 6/5/2013 13:22, Achim Gratz wrote: > > David Rothenberger writes: >> The good news is that the test cases that relied on temporary tables are >> now passing. > > Yes, but that is unrelated to the locking. I was assuming that the switch from disk-based temp tables to in-memory temp tables helped because it avoided the need to do disk file locking. In that sense, it is a way to fix part of the problem. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple