X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=SZ 0y14i7Q+jfBR8OcI5iYHb82ykVp3nQsgcOyl4j6TmD6PFMSWY8HH0eVFCeeGHZPV VJw1mYVuzwBV5mEbKjnhAcM6lk77GGlgT73Qy4KDj8R9ZCJcnjKj/TAFMl3tm8iS pQqMTJ7VzdrEFoYSZy7M4cwrci7jp/GMJs8jwCbcA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=mde1j4CR ZoHLh8/0qVpntTNWMIs=; b=PTrGrRtHc+G+eOj0z/nRY/FG6qLQ8nKuR2OswN20 WkRzXK2CcmRO+txp5qq5JCwvouvu0n7vmGUss0hbS8OrQzjXDVGsR9WeslC98m7J D8K2PsX1dvFAbVyIfBwdYqTc8MdwxBV9Qj8BfMEy8+Xxa88sZO6gyS3hYqWns1jE 9pY= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,SPF_PASS,TW_MK autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.37.134 with SMTP id x6mr11758721qad.98.1370098006261; Sat, 01 Jun 2013 07:46:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130529084703.GE31309@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <20130528133514 DOT GJ5264 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130528153302 DOT GL5264 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130529084703 DOT GE31309 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 19:46:46 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Shadowcopy volume block devices From: Micky To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > I'm looking forward to your feedback. This is now working like a charm! On the upside, I noticed one more thing. Unlike dd on traditional cmd, your implementation doesn't copy the zero blocks -- which to its considerable benefit is a humongous time saver for me as now I don't have to compress the image to save space! Whether this was intentional or not, I think we should keep it this way. And I do appreciate your instant fix! > Btw., as a sidenote, are you aware that you can access the filesystem > underneath the volume shadow copy as well? Yea, that was the first thing I noticed. I thought it was cool since I don't have to run diskshadow.exe or mklink to mount a volume. Just open up the bash and everything is there for you. Whoever came up with this idea, is a fathomable genius :)! Btw, when is this going to be released in stable branch? I did test the dumped image by restoring it, which also worked fine. Thanks. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple