X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=jpYgA3bctgTrdCb2sNf+T8G5fL4QM474UjvcR2H3VCZnRU4f7Lisy RCD6b5Lbawo2sifTvO5eekmcnGBC26uP52D05isHTfVsxH4zMAs8z5QNsInIpmlW uRHBFz8DxwyaHslYXaw7gYRQIp9vNL93rZFNp5KQDjQUw93nNLMcYc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=dlbRZRNa+o09rHh+XHNAe6HcaF4=; b=sGSnBis0Fe4AFtzZ3cJGbSeZuhbV qr7uDefXlQiopnyKUxe84FQCdWxIHw0IWrMe3gXhhopIn3bq0BDE9h+NyfjwA9Aj lxemu8lhmb2Q2dmVbCLfJ/fotBquLk0gIjaDHbiY3VSKDiTmEn/OboAkuNSD1DrH bZnBOVkeaQ2EUu0= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 20:00:22 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: BUG: Ability to access nonexistent directories Message-ID: <20130517180022.GQ21752@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <000201ce52c4$891b04c0$9b510e40$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <20130517083612 DOT GE21752 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <000d01ce52dc$74e54bb0$5eafe310$%fedin AT samsung DOT com> <20130517102655 DOT GG21752 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130517145612 DOT GC7087 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20130517152206 DOT GL21752 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20130517174857 DOT GB660 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130517174857.GB660@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) On May 17 13:48, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 05:22:06PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On May 17 10:56, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:26:55PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> >On May 17 12:56, Fedin Pavel wrote: > >> >> Hello! > >> >> > >> >> > The reason for this behaviour has been outlined a couple of times on > >> >> > this list. See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-01/msg00173.html, > >> >> > for instance. > >> >> > >> >> Heh... > >> >> So, complete emulation would cost a major performance drop, right ? > >> >> Well... Can there be any setting which enables these checks ? At least we have one use case... > >> > > >> >Not without lots of new code. > >> > >> So, maybe next Thursday? > > > >I would love to, but unfortunately I have to brush my cat on Thursday. > >And I don't even have a cat. > > You're welcome to brush mine in that case. I don't have one either. > > So it sounds like we may have a feline inavailability deadlock. Is that ENOFEL or EFLOCK? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple