X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=KQupr7GZlUD8UVAwZqye5/zfRQOhH hA9RwvtRShizY9K8CesZH//v+HykwRnesNlgHWy7FKdr7Gblw0mRX7k3wId6k24l PHXA6ejQ2JcR70UAeSGZ8g5ORZZId8mP3XMB9btS/fN8zx3Zn8FzykaVyy0wWRVq grshiL56Mtd33U= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; s=default; bh=a5QlgPsJk5lGZ3wvAZvdyi0hatU=; b=C/J bqWYIMH8691Kxk0CyBb6UjVuEW1NZAlBKUSpFrxHbFNMGJUyrT6orYJVydDYlEkJ RtpeMB97QPz2/4NnATcoXNeNZDGfybaGygTwnZUaF70O/gzckrd3YfqhRb/nSUuq VT0r/3qUkVg/ypftK9ye8zjsokJvmYvX2dylRA7A= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 From: Adam Dinwoodie To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Subject: RE: Fwd: reboot command behaves different on Linux Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:04:07 +0000 Deferred-Delivery: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:04:00 +0000 Message-ID: References: <514CE853 DOT 2000000 AT gmail DOT com> <20130323223138 DOT GB40309 AT justpickone DOT org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id r2QF4WtY016611 Earnie Boyd wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Frank Fesevur wrote: >> 2013/3/23 David T-G: >>> % This would still conflict with the -H of the ones above, but I have no >>> % problem with it. Anyone against changing hibernate to -H? >>> >>> What about 'b' for hi'b'ernate? >> >> That was my original suggestion, but Anthony liked the -H better. >> >> I have given it a thought over the weekend and since the -H conflicts >> with -H of the Linux shutdown commands, I think I prefer the -b as >> short for hibernate. > > To me -b sounds like 'b;inary how about -s for 's'leep since sleep is > synonymous with hibernate. Sleep is very definitely not synonymous with hibernate! Sleeping puts the computer in a low-power mode, but keeps the computer turned on with data in RAM. Hibernating writes the contents of the RAM to disk, then completely powers down the computer. -- Adam Dinwoodie Messages posted to this list are made in a personal capacity.