X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=O8QEiu3L10ck7N/I10Tmg5hcLBXB4V+Mtr4Qa2eFsUK
	0lDwqUrPU8jEN6kgv52eTV5hbXSFveMFAw4/MONMUq7c0j3oAi/qgbD3UaaIl1Bk
	Ko7gL+5vvSn1gc2QWE0Jqo5oYQWoyUFQQrLHSmWx5MbbVAvwqiwpml3EVrgPExsY
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=aGj7G6tYhhEy8BlA4Y1NU8l28tA=; b=y2HLYSPOodL0NYlDD
	oVm5Kkq/fcUYhH16HbiEyjFMHfEQLTlKyOTf5nH1x6QbFQL7iKgYkWO5kM83r/Ki
	SeWhScLxU4soD3EArrPkll8sWTALC/ME7uivpBeDjPpRe8ngt33D7G/LDs1IS3RC
	V1b2n0DcOBi/zsavAeqD8jqxZI=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Received: by 10.180.36.48 with SMTP id n16mr1229170wij.30.1363994709186;        Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <514CE853.2000000@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 23:25:07 +0000
From: Anthony Geoghegan <anthony DOT geoghegan AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Frank Fesevur <ffes AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Fwd: reboot command behaves different on Linux
References: <CAKf2h5Q7Ui7szcGKFMip5UUvurPnGTv=C=n-iXo8Wwo0qLP4YA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKf2h5Q7Ui7szcGKFMip5UUvurPnGTv=C=n-iXo8Wwo0qLP4YA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Yes, that bugs my for quite some time too, is -h for halt or
> hibernate? Now the -s is the same as the Windows shutdown.exe. The
> changes are really straight forward. -b could be the new short option
> for hibernate, doesn't interfere with the main linux shutdown options
> or the windows shutdown. Leaving -s as it is for backward/windows
> compatibility reasons and adding -h, --halt for shutdown and -P,
> --poweroff. But then, having three options that actually don't do
> anything, just for the sake of compatibility? EWX_POWEROFF is the
> default action already. That's why I left those shutdown options as
> they are. But I gladly write the patch if nobody has objections
> against changing -h.

I thought about it for a while myself before posting but I concluded 
your choice was a good one: the usefulness of -h for hibernate probably 
outweighed the benefits of retaining compatibility with a more 
traditional (BSD) Unix shutdown. I checked to see if POSIX had anything 
specified but it's not concerned with the shutdown command.

Having thought about it bit more, I'd like to suggest an upper case -H 
as the option for hibernate.

Keep up the good work,
Anthony

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple