X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsANAFa9uk+rRDoI/2dsb2JhbABEtBqBBx0BAYF2AQEBAwESAR0KNBANAQgYCgYYB0gBDgEEEwgSCIdnBAGdWoEooAuLBYRaYgOIQpplgWSDCQ
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: Is the Latest Release of Cygwin supported on Windows Server 8/2012
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 15:15:32 -0700
Message-ID: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C31348C437@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com>
From: "Matt Seitz (matseitz)" <matseitz AT cisco DOT com>
To: "The Cygwin Mailing List" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q4LMFvsj002792

"Andrew DeFaria" <Andrew AT DeFaria DOT com> wrote in message
news:<jpec46$b4v$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>...
> On 5/21/2012 1:48 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> > On 5/21/2012 11:34 AM, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> >
> >
> > Consider a 32-bit executable that is 4 GB in size.
> Do you know of one 32-bit executable that is 4 GB in size? Just one?
OK, 
> how about 3 GB? No. 

I don't think Warren's note said there was a 4GB 32-bit executable.  I
think it said a 4GB 32-bit executable would be the worst case scenario
for 64-bit executable size bloat.

> Well have you considered the following: "Anyway I think I'm 
> done with this topic"? I didn't think so.

Are you saying Warren should not post a response to the mailing list,
just because you personally are no longer interested in the discussion?

As a subscriber, I've found reading both sides interesting and
informative.




--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple