X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_CG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Daniel Diaz Subject: Re: gcc: turning off large-address awareness Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 07:32:46 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <4F896504 DOT 3030006 AT cornell DOT edu> <4F89B215 DOT 9050903 AT cornell DOT edu> <20120414173342 DOT GD15801 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4F89C67B DOT 30905 AT cornell DOT edu> <20120414190103 DOT GC17287 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes: > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 02:48:27PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: > >On 4/14/2012 1:33 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> You're right that there isn't a way to disable --large-address-aware > >> but, since it's part of the specs, I'm not sure what would take > >> precedence if there was a --disable* option. > >> > >> You could try using the above to create your own spec file and use > >> that on the command line for gcc, cumbersome as it is. > > > >That works, thanks. I didn't know about spec files. > > I'll try to remember to add a --disable option to my next binutils > release. > > cgf > > Hi Christopher, when do you plan to release a version of binutils recognizing a --disable-large-address-aware flag ? Daniel -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple