X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 15:15:13 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [Bug] rebaseall Message-ID: <20120503131513.GA5977@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20120503075119 DOT GG3031 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20120503124602 DOT GA2844 AT tishler DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120503124602.GA2844@tishler.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi Jason, On May 3 08:46, Jason Tishler wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:51:19AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On May 3 06:59, Achim Gratz wrote: > > > In addition, there should be a "picket fence" in front of those > > > expression(s), too. Otherwise they match other lines that are not > > > supposed to be deleted (the DLL lines are probably safe, but could > > > be changed defensively as well). > > > > Sounds good to me. > > > > Jason, I would suggest the following patch to apply to the next rebase > > release, courtesy Achim: > > > > [snip] > > OK, but how about using sed's -r option instead of escaping the question > marks? Sure. I just didn't, because the -r option and extended regex is non-portable, but I guess we will never use anything other than GNU sed anyway. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple