X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,TW_CG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse AT dyndns DOT com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/iLKybNPNbVjGEgr3UPruh Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 10:48:30 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: cygwin-1.7.10-1 fork - address space needed by ... already in use Message-ID: <20120309154829.GA31351@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20120208092711 DOT GF25129 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20120208102235 DOT GA2796 AT qp9482> <20120304172210 DOT GI18852 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20120305070927 DOT GA2396 AT qp9482> <20120305095919 DOT GO18852 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20120305120230 DOT GA6624 AT qp9482> <20120305121436 DOT GR18852 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20120307174749 DOT GB19570 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20120308085029 DOT GA9588 AT qp9482> <20120308095535 DOT GT5159 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120308095535.GT5159@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 10:55:35AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Mar 8 09:50, Denis Excoffier wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 06:47:49PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >> Hi Denis, >> >> >> >> can you please test this again using the latest developer snapshot or >> >> the current from CVS if you build Cygwin by yourself? It provides a bit >> >> more information to find the reason for the permission denied error in >> >> _pinfo::dup_proc_pipe. >> Thank you cgf (the committer and snapshot maker at least). >> >> >> >> In theory, the user should have permissions to duplicate handles into >> >> every own process, if the handle has been opened with these permissions, >> >> so it's quite interesting to find the reason. >> >> >> >> After about 3 hours of exercising the new snapshot (and shaking it a >> little), i met the "something failed" instance only twice: >> >> 1 [main] tcsh 7648! _pinfo::dup_proc_pipe: (child_info_spawn::worker) process synchronization failed for pid 7648/0x754, wr_proc_pipe 0x0 vs. 0x764: DuplicateHandle winerr 5, WFSO returned 258, Win32 error 5 >> 503 [main] tcsh 6148! _pinfo::dup_proc_pipe: (child_info_spawn::worker) process synchronization failed for pid 6148/0x758, wr_proc_pipe 0x0 vs. 0x768: DuplicateHandle winerr 5, WFSO returned 258, Win32 error 5 >> >> I continue, of course. > >Thanks, I don't think it's necessary to try further. What this shows is >that the process handle returned by the call to CreateProcess sometimes, >for some reason, does not allow handle duplication. That's weird. I have a vague idea about why this is happening. I'll look into it within the next 48 hours. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple