X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com designates 10.68.226.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.226.170; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com designates 10.68.226.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com; dkim=pass header.i=marco DOT atzeri AT gmail DOT com Message-ID: <4F4651BB.2000803@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:48:27 +0100 From: marco atzeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: more "address space needed ... is already occupied" problems (with snapshot of 2012-02-20) References: <20120222192933 DOT 0a8e03f6 DOT tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com> <20120222223256 DOT 90d4fc28 DOT tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com> <9e752647709269ea7d2fdadb8cc1a4a7-EhVcXl1ERwBcRx0AAAwEUR8fGQlVS19cWF9EAV1EWEZaOl0IQVdyH1RXWEFaQSoDXFlZQFhSXwpZ-webmailer1 AT server03 DOT webmailer DOT hosteurope DOT de> In-Reply-To: <9e752647709269ea7d2fdadb8cc1a4a7-EhVcXl1ERwBcRx0AAAwEUR8fGQlVS19cWF9EAV1EWEZaOl0IQVdyH1RXWEFaQSoDXFlZQFhSXwpZ-webmailer1@server03.webmailer.hosteurope.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 2/23/2012 3:35 PM, Tassilo Philipp wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Tassilo Philipp wrote: >>> Doesn't do anything, and believe me, I tried that probably 50 times in >>> all kinds of combinations... >> >> do not top post please. > > ? I just hit reply... so I don't know what you mean? Sorry if I did > something weird. > see: http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php#toppost > >> From where this "etc.so" is coming for ? > > I guess ruby. I'll check exactly where it's from... > However, I tried to rebase it as you described below, and still face the > same problem. > I'll check if I face the BLODA problem as Corinna pointed out. > > Thank you for your help, so far! etc.so is a dll coming from ruby. http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=etc.so Could you try to explain us what exactly are you running/doing when you catch the error ? I doubt you are simply running a ruby program. As "etc.so" belongs to ruby package, rebaseall should have already rebased "etc.so" to another address than 0x360000 what is the outcome of rebase -s -i |grep etc.so Regards Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple