X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Squirrel-UserHash: EhVcXl1ERwBcRx0AAAwEUR8f
X-Squirrel-FromHash: VldYW1gVRgA=
Message-ID: <9e752647709269ea7d2fdadb8cc1a4a7-EhVcXl1ERwBcRx0AAAwEUR8fGQlVS19cWF9EAV1EWEZaOl0IQVdyH1RXWEFaQSoDXFlZQFhSXwpZ-webmailer1@server03.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAB8Xom8_toaEuW=M4Gd7bBvwEZ7GbjSwdpsCp-U3RPTgjHYEyw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120222192933 DOT 0a8e03f6 DOT tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com>    <CAB8Xom93QjbOG2Jycy33GyR4EdCNix5XN3_UDe0TYGpb3vfmeg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>    <20120222223256 DOT 90d4fc28 DOT tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com>    <CAB8Xom8_toaEuW=M4Gd7bBvwEZ7GbjSwdpsCp-U3RPTgjHYEyw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:35:26 +0100
Subject: Re: more "address space needed ... is already occupied" problems (with snapshot of 2012-02-20)
From: "Tassilo Philipp" <tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To: tphilipp AT potion-studios DOT com
User-Agent: Host Europe Webmailer/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-HE-Access: Yes
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Tassilo Philipp  wrote:
>> Doesn't do anything, and believe me, I tried that probably 50 times in
>> all kinds of combinations...
>
> do not top post please.

? I just hit reply... so I don't know what you mean? Sorry if I did
something weird.


> From where this "etc.so" is coming for ?

I guess ruby. I'll check exactly where it's from...
However, I tried to rebase it as you described below, and still face the
same problem.
I'll check if I face the BLODA problem as Corinna pointed out.

Thank you for your help, so far!


> If it is something that you just built, than you should add all your
> dll / so files to the rebase list using the "-T" option
>
> rebaseall [-b BaseAddress] [-o Offset] [-s DllSuffix] [-T FileList |
> -] [-4|-8] [-v}
>
> so something like
>
> find you_build_tree -name "*.so" > /tmp/rebase_list
> find you_build_tree -name "*.dll" >> /tmp/rebase_list
>
> and from dash
> rebaseall -T /tmp/rebase_list
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 04:03:45 +0100
>> marco atzeri  wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Tassilo Philipp  wrote:
>>> > Hello ml,
>>> >
>>> > I recently ran into many problems using rake to build a few of my
>>> projects, whenever rake calls itself recursively (for subprojects,
>>> etc. as in a typical make-style build tool setup). It's very random -
>>> sometimes I get a single error, sometimes nothing, but most of the
>>> time it sits there and prints the following until I kill the build:
>>> >
>>> >     17 [main] ruby 1028 child_info_fork::abort: address space needed
>>> by 'etc.so' (0x360000) is already occupied
>>> >      1 [main] ruby 2076 child_info_fork::abort: address space needed
>>> by 'etc.so' (0x360000) is already occupied
>>> >      1 [main] ruby 2128 child_info_fork::abort: address space needed
>>> by 'etc.so' (0x360000) is already occupied
>>> >     ....
>>> >
>>> > I checked the mailing list and found all kind of infos about similar
>>> problem, but none of the solutions worked for me. What I -
>>> unsuccessfully - tried so far:
>>> >
>>> > - using the snapshot of feb 9, 2012 (which contains a fix by Corinna,
>>> that apparently solved a very similar problem pointed out a few days
>>> ago)
>>> > - using latest snapshot of feb 20, 2012
>>> > - using cygwin 1.7.10 and 1.7.9
>>> > - playing around with rebaseall and peflagsall, with and without
>>> rebooting the machine
>>> > - using ruby 1.8.7 as it is available via setup.exe
>>> > - using self-built version of llatest release of ruby 1.9.3
>>> > - wiping cygwin off my machine and reinstalling a mint version
>>> > - many different combinations of the above
>>> >
>>> > So well, I guess 'm stuck. Any ideas?
>>>
>>> rebaseall ?
>>> That is the standard solution for fork problem.
>>> http://cygwin.com/faq-nochunks.html#faq.using.fixing-fork-failures
>>>
>>> It is likely needed any time you install a different cygwin version
>>> including snapshots
>>> or upgrade any other packages.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Marco
>>>
>>> --
>>> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
>>> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>>> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
>>> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
>
>


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple