X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of d DOT sastre DOT medina AT gmail DOT com designates 10.180.106.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.106.67; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of d DOT sastre DOT medina AT gmail DOT com designates 10.180.106.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=d DOT sastre DOT medina AT gmail DOT com; dkim=pass header.i=d DOT sastre DOT medina AT gmail DOT com Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 21:16:51 +0100 From: David Sastre Medina To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: hexedit install flub...now shell seems rudimentary Message-ID: <20120218201651.GB5319@jethro.local.lan> References: <4F3F98C1 DOT 6000400 AT cornell DOT edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F3F98C1.6000400@cornell.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 07:25:37AM -0500, Ken Brown wrote: > On 2/18/2012 4:20 AM, Adrian Sandstrom wrote: > >Would love if someone could help me get me back to my cozy Cygwin termin= al. > > > >Problem: > >When I use the cygwin shortcuts to cygwin.bat or mintty.exe I am > >getting a basic terminal. > >1) The command prompt displays "-bash-4.1$" instead of > >"username AT directory" like before. >=20 > It sounds like PS1 isn't being set. This is normally done in > /etc/profile. You might start by comparing /etc/profile with > /etc/defaults/etc/profile. They should be identical unless you've > customized /etc/profile at some point. >=20 > The postinstall script for the base-files package should have taken > care of updating /etc/profile, so you could also check to make sure > the script was executed. This is probably caused by incorrect permissions in the latest base-files' package contents. A release fixing this will be available shortly. For the time being, please check and correct perms in: /etc/bash.bash_logout /etc/profile.d /etc/profile.d/tzset.sh /etc/profile.d/tzset.csh /etc/profile.d/lang.csh /etc/profile.d/lang.sh /etc/bash.bashrc /etc/skel/.inputrc /etc/skel/.profile /etc/skel/.bashrc /etc/skel/.bash_profile /etc/profile All of them should have owner/group root.root and 644 perms (rw-r--r--) Hope that helps. --=20 Huella de clave primaria: AD8F BDC0 5A2C FD5F A179 60E7 F79B AB04 5299 EC56 --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk9ABzMACgkQ95urBFKZ7FaorAD+NQ/bt+4YJTh/671BXulsFAwC cUxAwSteMzmpAm8gWHQA/AilFc9zuOZQ+hNcHZFzKUIYapb+4KIqw8meIKHkoxtF =aCQL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y--