X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:41:56 +0100
From: David Sastre Medina <d DOT sastre DOT medina AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: base-files problem
Message-ID: <20120216204156.GB9451@jethro.local.lan>
References: <jhjhh3$tu3$1 AT dough DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cmJC7u66zC7hs+87"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <jhjhh3$tu3$1@dough.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

--cmJC7u66zC7hs+87
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:22:25PM -0600, Ren=E9 Berber wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> The changes in base-files deleted everything from /etc/skel, I
> re-installed 4.0-9 and still nothing.
> I can see in the package list that there should be the usual files
> there, did some post-install script deleted those files?
> Anyone seen the same problem? (i.e. your bash prompt changed, no longer
> shows the current directory).
> Any idea what is causing this?  It started yesterday after I updated a
> few packages, base-files was not even listed as installed, which is
> strange, I then re-installed it.

I have just updated a box from base-files-4.0-6 to 4.0-9 and
everything worked as expected. I tried both with locally modified and
unmodified skel files.

$ grep base-files /etc/defaults/etc/skel/.*
/etc/defaults/etc/skel/.bash_profile:# base-files version 4.0-9
/etc/defaults/etc/skel/.bashrc:# base-files version 4.0-9
/etc/defaults/etc/skel/.inputrc:# base-files version 4.0-9
/etc/defaults/etc/skel/.profile:# base-files version 4.0-9

The process of checking wether the files have to be replaced has not
changed since 4.0-4 (march 2011) at least. And IIRC, it was barely the
same in the 3.x version as well.

If reinstalling fails as well, does an error get printed?

--=20
Huella de clave primaria: AD8F BDC0 5A2C FD5F A179  60E7 F79B AB04 5299 EC56

--cmJC7u66zC7hs+87
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iF4EAREIAAYFAk89ahQACgkQ95urBFKZ7Fa4PgD7BCvHPAjnyXwkoHmNFzQWFVeB
OVCd2kZiRKMGsNT95N8A/iFh24PtZEoFIH1J2njyxAiKhChBFLJ8wMxYP4QRbDwX
=q4s+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cmJC7u66zC7hs+87--