X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4EFBACC9.7090804@cpan.org> References: <4EFBACC9 DOT 7090804 AT cpan DOT org> Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 01:42:54 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: perlrebase, is there no better way? From: Reini Urban To: rkitover AT cpan DOT org, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id pBT7hKYY015330 On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Rafael Kitover wrote: > perlrebase is great, but it has some shortcomings. > > You often have to break out of a cpan install and run it then continue, > then break out again, etc. to install some modules. > > It doesn't automatically detect local::lib and perlbrew libs (perhaps I > can patch it for that.) Maybe support for a list of other dirs in > ~/.perlrebase would be good. > > What if ExtUtils::MakeMaker and Module::Build, in the code for the .dll > link stage, would automatically rebase the resulting .dll to some > address as set in /etc/perlrebase.conf? Sure. That's the plan for the upcoming 5.14.2 release. We have a global rebase database now so it's even fast. It just is not stable enough, and my win PC broke down. > Reini, what do you think? -- Reini Urban http://cpanel.net/   http://www.perl-compiler.org/ -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple