X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_VF,TW_XV X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <32995016.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 10:27:23 -0800 (PST) From: manu0507 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Apparently solved! (Re: Sorry "people" (NOT MY taxonomy!!), but igncr IS flawed) In-Reply-To: <4EECBD8C.2010409@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <32989786 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4EEC34F4 DOT 9090409 AT bopp DOT net> <32994383 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4EECBD8C DOT 2010409 AT gmail DOT com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Hi Dave, Dave Korn-9 wrote: > > On 17/12/2011 15:50, manu0507 wrote: > >> - the script causing trouble comes in the GNU gdb distribution >> gdb-7.3.1.tar.gz > > Hah! I know what's happened: you used a windows program such as winzip > or > similar to unpack the archive, and it's gone and "helpfully" munged all > the > line endings for you. Use 'tar xvfz gdb-7.3.1.tar.gz' at the Cygwin shell > command-line and you'll get a correctly unpacked version. (There > definitely > aren't CRLFs in the upstream release of the configure scripts.) Windows > GUI-based archivers are well known for causing this problem. > My gosh, that's it! I Indeed extracted with WinZip... I WAS a bit suspicious, and looked in WinZip for an option like "Output text files in DOS format" or so that I could UNcheck, but having not found it, I thought WinZip would not be so intrusive as to modify the files that were compressed... Well, I never said Win was perfect, did I? ;-) That being said, it's still sort of beyond me why all [CR][LF]s would be converted ok... except the ones I reported. Dave Korn-9 wrote: > > (Also, if you think that Eric's reply was "acrimonious", you're just > having > some sort of using-language-in-different-ways communication problem. I > saw it > earlier and it seemed perfectly polite and proper to me, I honestly can't > see > what about it would offend you.) > > cheers, > DaveK > Ok, maybe Eric actually likes being called "people"... my fault then. Many thanks & Merry Christmas, Emanuel -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Sorry-%22people%22-%28NOT-MY-taxonomy%21%21%29%2C-but-igncr-IS-flawed-tp32989786p32995016.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple