X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,TW_YG,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4E1AFE3A.4070406@gmail.com>
References: <4E1AAF38 DOT 9040100 AT gmail DOT com>	<20110711082740 DOT GC8249 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>	<4E1AB60C DOT 7050902 AT gmail DOT com>	<20110711090218 DOT GA22947 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>	<4E1AC212 DOT 7030806 AT gmail DOT com>	<20110711095630 DOT GB22947 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>	<4E1ACF65 DOT 6070102 AT gmail DOT com>	<20110711114747 DOT GD22947 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>	<20110711120430 DOT GE22947 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>	<4E1AFE3A DOT 4070406 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:27:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGHJv4dMnBfpM5jr_O8urBrpdbTD2+D2U1LVgwGJsEs471thyg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Random fork failures
From: Chris Sutcliffe <ir0nh34d AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p6BHSMlm020595

On 11 July 2011 09:44, yoni levi wrote:
>>> Actually, I have not the faintest idea.  Can you build your own Cygwin
>>> DLL without -O2, see if it still occurs, and run that scenario through
>>> GDB?
>>
>> cygcheck -svr output as per http://cygwin.com/problems.html might give
>> some clue as well...
>>
>>
> Well, it works just fine with the debug (-O0) version.
> With release (-02) version, it crashes (with my compilation, and with
> snapshot from cygwin.com).

Could this be another gcc 4.3.4 compiler issue (similar to the issue
encountered with vim)?

Chris

-- 
Chris Sutcliffe
http://emergedesktop.org
http://www.google.com/profiles/ir0nh34d

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple