X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: From: Karl M To: , Subject: RE: Please upload: mined-2000.16-0 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:39:51 -0800 In-Reply-To: <4D598E78.5000002@towo.net> References: <0M3MGG-1NSYIM09lw-00rakK AT mrelayeu DOT kundenserver DOT de> <20110213163515 DOT GB20855 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>,<4D5858AA DOT 8030502 AT towo DOT net> ,<4D598E78 DOT 5000002 AT towo DOT net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:20:08 +0100 > From: Thomas > Subject: Re: Please upload: mined-2000.16-0 > > Am 13.02.2011 23:25, schrieb Karl M: > > > > > > > >> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 23:18:18 +0100 > >> From: Thomas > >> Subject: Re: Please upload: mined-2000.16-0 > >>> The reason is that, at least on Windows 7, there is no key called > >>> HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\SystemFileAssociations. > >>> > >>> The result is that a user of Windows 7 gets a postinstall warning from > >>> setup.exe because the mined postinstall script returns a non-zero exit > >>> code. > >>> > >>> > >>> Corinna > >> Hi, thanks for the notice. > >> Actually I'm aware that there is this postinstall return problem also = in > >> Windows XP and I've fixed it but the code base isn't quite ready yet f= or > >> the next release - can it still wait for a short while? > >> On the other hand, if the key doesn't exist because the mechanism has > >> changed in Windows 7, I'm not sure what to do because I don't have W7 > >> myself for testing - any advice by someone? Just some other key name > >> perhaps? > > Why is mined by default messing with this? Isn't this something that th= e user should run if he/she wants to alter file associations/context menu s= tuff? > I once discussed this with Andy and felt encouraged to do so - after > all, non-expert users will not normally make such an entry because there > is no tool to do it easily (I think). > But I'll reconsider and maybe confine it to the stand-alone package. > Thanks for considering it. I think that a script that the used could run af= ter installation would be fine. I don't use it, so it does not impact me di= rectly. But I would not have expected that installing an editor in Cygwin w= ould change windows file associations. I use vi in Cygwin, but would not wa= nt that to change my file associations. =20 Thanks, =20 ...Karl=20=09=09=20=09=20=20=20=09=09=20=20 -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple